The Spectator

The Spectator at war: Attack and defence

From our UK edition

From The Spectator, 3 October 1914: The essential value of a fortress is to act as an anvil upon which the field army, or relieving army, outside, which is the hammer, may pound the assailants to atoms. If there is such an army out- side, the parts are reversed—the besiegers, since they must stick to their position, become, as far as the relieving army is concerned, the besieged. It is the relieving army which can choose the place to hit and the time to hit. Unless the besiegers should prove to have enough troops to push it off and drive it away, the field army, when it gets to the proper distance, will strike the iron on the anvil and break it in pieces.

The Spectator at war: Compulsory service

From our UK edition

From The Spectator, 3 October 1914: We do not suggest that the voluntary principle should be abandoned during this war. The system is being worked for all it is worth ; it is answering well, thanks to the splendid spirit of the country ; and it would be absurd to change it mid-way for another system. But we cannot help reflecting that if we had had the scheme of National Service—of compulsory training for home defence, which is a different thing from conscription—recommended so earnestly and powerfully by Lord Roberts we should not now be in the throes of painfully improvising an Army....When the war is over there will be a steady demand fur the surest, cheapest, and most beneficial method of military defence—compulsory training for the youth of the country.