The Skimmer

The Director-General needs to find out how the other 90% live

From our UK edition

Calling for a sense of "perspective" and "proportionality" in coverage of British youth, the BBC's Director-General, Mark Thompson, complained on Radio 4's Today on Tuesday that you could get the impression from much media coverage that Britain was a "nightmare landscape of roving bands of drunken teenagers".   The blunt truth is that, in certain parts of the country, the nightmare is all too real and the BBC has consistently under-reported it. Within 24 hours of Thompson's interview the London Evening Standard was reporting that, in London alone, five children are injured in gun or knife attacks every day.

Wrong exit

From our UK edition

A set or first editions of today's newspapers will be a collector's item. Here are a selection of their stories, usually printed at 9pm, predicting Hillary's downfall. "Iowa, New Hampshire, America? Obama's incredible journey" (Independent splash). "Clinton moves to Plan B" (Guardian splash) "Hillary to sack aides as she faces defeat" (Telegraph, p1). "Obama dealt a potentially fatal blow to Hillary Clinton's chances of being US President yesterday" (intro on The Sun's p4 lead", "Hillary Clinton's hopes of becoming the first female president in US history were crumbling last night" (Daily Mail intro, p10 lead). "The tears are falling but Clinton vows to fight on" (times, p6). Many changed this radically by their final edition, and the times did so especially well.

The BBC was not even warm about global temperatures

From our UK edition

Almost a year ago, BBC News reported (January 04),  that "the world is likely to experience the warmest year on record in 2007." In fact, temperatures in 2007 were no different from 2006, or indeed 2001.   Overall, temperatures (as measured by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Britain's Met Office, the UN's IPCC -- and even Al Gore) last year were broadly the same as they had been in 1998 -- yet CO2 emissions have continued to increase at an even faster rate in the last decade than they did 1980-98, when global temperatures did indeed rise.   It would be good journalism if BBC News looked again at why its report of a year ago turned out to be so wrong.

Britain’s out of touch elite is shocked by reality

From our UK edition

Fleet Street seems staggered to hear that half a million under-35s are on incapacity benefit – as publicised by the FT yesterday. Even Xinhua, the Chinese government newswire service, follows up the report (socialism, but certainly not as they know it). The Daily Mail’s leader refers to “shocking new” figures - shocking yes, but hardly new as I pointed out yesterday. These figures have been printed quarterly, for at least a decade. No journalists took note. And today's count is the lowest since the current data series started in 1999. So our press is not startled because the figure is new. It’s just that no one seems to have noticed before.

Number crunching

From our UK edition

The FT’s story about 500,000 youths “too sick to work” should cause shock, but not surprise. The “figures obtained by the FT” can also be obtained by any teenager with an internet connection (for DWP time series, click here). This is a story because the degree of ignorance about the UK welfare state (and those it entraps). The sad fact is that the FT’s story could have been written at any point in the last decade. The Guardian could do a version, trumpeting the fact that the figure has been steadily coming down from 550,000 in 1999. Good to see the recently-appointed Newspaper of the Year is not beneath the old New Year’s Day trick of dressing old data up as new. PS If the FT’s looking for a follow-up there’s 1.

Bovver for the BBC over the foul Catherine Tate Christmas Special

From our UK edition

On Boxing Day, The Skimmer noted how the Catherine Tate Christmas Special with its orgy of swearing was hardly suitable for BBC1 on Christmas Day. Now, The Times reports that OFCOM is to investigate the show following a flurry of complaints from viewers about the "most offensive programme ever broadcast by the BBC on a Christmas Day”. Even Catherine Tate seems to have realised that things went too far, telling The Radio Times:  “I don’t know how this Christmas special got so depraved because it isn’t what I set out to do”.  The BBC is standing by its decision, arguing that one of the character’s foul language “was fundamental to what makes her funny.” That may be.

Why is the BBC’s coverage of the Pakistan crisis so poor?

From our UK edition

Anyone listening to BBC Radio for the latest on Pakistan would have found only Five Live running with it. When I switched on, they had a chap with a South Asian accent – who I assumed would be a Pakistani politician, or expert of some kind. Turned out he was just a random bloke who owns a restaurant in Southall, with no more clue what was happening than anyone else. The internet killed off foreign correspondents for Fleet Street titles when it became clear that their main job – reading the day’s press – can now be done from London. So that explains the lack of in-depth coverage from the UK media so far. But the BBC, with its vast world empire, has no excuse.

A foul Christmas special

From our UK edition

The Catherine Tate Show's Christmas Day Special managed over 20 uses of the F-word in the first five minutes, which must be something of a record, even by today's debased standards of modern entertainment.   True, the show was broadcast at 10.30pm, safely after the 9pm watershed when more adult material is shown, but this was on BBC1 on Christmas Day at a time when millions of families were likely to be watching together after the rigours of the day. We suspect many parents with youngish families must have grabbed the zapper and embarrassingly switched to something more appropriate.   Is the constant repetition of the F-word in the first sketch of a popular comedy show on Christmas Day really the BBC's idea of family programming? What editorial vetting procedures did it undergo?

Why does Atonement knock Britain?

From our UK edition

Watched "Atonement", starring Keira Knightley and James McAvoy, the film version of Ian McEwan's novel and the latest British costume drama which American critics affect to love (hence talk of Oscars) but to which American audiences are indifferent (in two weeks in the US it's taken only a paltry $3.5m at the box office).   Atonement is fine as these things go, yet another depiction of class-ridden Britain in the 1930s, which encourages global audiences to think we're still the same out-dated stratified museum in 2007.   In general the film depends on high-quality dialogue and lovingly-depicted country-house scenes, which are cheap to shoot. Most of the budget, however, seems to have been blown on recreating the evacuation of Dunkirk in 1940.

The Murdochs and the Middle East

From our UK edition

Rupert Murdoch is such a hard-right supporter of Israel -- Ariel Sharon was his great hero (he even visited him on his farm) -- that many regard him as a Zionist. So the staunchly pro-Israel Wall Street Journal has nothing to fear on that front as the Murdoch tentacles get to grips with it. The same might not be true for Murdoch's London titles -- The Times, The Sunday Times, The Sun and News of the World -- all strongly pro-Israel under the guidance of Murdoch's heavy hand. But that might be about to change for these newspapers are all now under the control of Murdoch's son, James, who has pronounced pro-Palestinian views which he holds strongly. Consider the following, from Alastair Campbell's Diaries, which most commentators seem to have missed.

Connections … between the BBC and Blair

From our UK edition

The distinguishing characteristic of the three-part documentary on the Blair years which ended on BBC1 last Sunday was not just that it failed to tell us things we didn't already know. No, what was most intriguing about it was the web of interconnecting BBC-Blairite links that lay behind it. Consider the following.   The series was made for the BBC by Juniper, an independent production company run by Samir Shah, who used to run BBC Westminster. An intelligent man of strong Blairite sympathies, he does more than just run Juniper -- he is also a non-executive director on the board of the BBC.   Juniper's managing director is Richard Clemmow. He used to be Head of News at the BBC.

The Bash Britain Corporation

From our UK edition

The BBC's version of the Nativity this Christmas will depict Mary and Joseph as asylum seekers rejected by brutal Britain. Yes, once again the Beeb plays fast and loose with history so that we can all think the worst of our country. So let's remember some facts. First, this country's record in giving genuine asylum seekers refuge is second to none, a matter for pride rather than disparagement. Second, Mary and Joseph were not in any sense asylum seekers, nor were they dirt poor. They were a Middle Judean family who had gone to Bethlehem to participate in a census (primarily for tax purposes) but arrived so late all the inns were full (hence the resort to the stable). None of this matters, of course, to the cultural secularists who dominate BBC drama.

Nought out of ten for the News at Ten

From our UK edition

Amazingly bad news judgement by the BBC1 News at Ten last night when it devoted only 10 seconds -- and a mere voiceover at that -- to the latest development in the shambles that is Peter Hain's funding arrangements (aka Labour's dodgy donations -- the sideshow). I'm inclined to believe this was cock up rather than the usual BBC leftie bias, though it would be interesting to know on what basis they downgraded the story to near oblivion. Newscaster Huw Edwards, who likes robust journalism, must have been furious. BBC2's Newsnight showed far better judgement by going to town with it as the lead story and at last giving proper coverage to the crisis surrounding Labour's Scottish Leader, Wendy Alexander, who's job as they say north of the border is now "hingin by a shoogly peg" (ask F.

The Times: tabloid in news values as well as size

From our UK edition

This morning's Times has an interview with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan -- not a bad journalistic commodity at a time when separatist Kurdish rebels killed at least 12 Turkish soldiers in an ambush near the Iraqi border and the drums of war are beating ever louder in Ankara.   Curiously, The Times could only find room on its front page for a 50-word write-off of its international scoop, demoting the main story to page 5. Instead, it chose to splash with yet another dubious story on childhood obesity.   Editor Robert Thomson is a serious, thoughtful man who has striven to keep his paper's content serious even as it went tabloid in size.