Mark Davies

The Budget exposed a myth: people don’t want to pay more tax to fund the NHS

From our UK edition

Perhaps the most interesting thing about the debate on the increase in National Insurance Contributions for the self-employed is that it lays bare the lie that people are happier to pay more tax to fund the NHS. In December, the Guardian reported a study that suggested that 70 per cent of people would 'happily pay an extra 1p in every pound if that money was guaranteed to go to the NHS', while almost half of the 1,000 people surveyed said that they would even pay an extra 2p in the £. Where are these people now?

In defence of John Inverdale

From our UK edition

I love Clare Balding. In line with just about everyone else, I think she is a class act. And having known her since university days, I can vouch for the fact that not only is she a very nice person, but also - rather marvellously - completely unaffected by her very well-deserved status as a national star. But she landed John Inverdale in it on the last day of the Olympic Games, after he had already come in for a large amount of totally unwarranted stick. He was criticised for apparently ignoring people he is interviewing, because he does what all broadcast interviewers do in such situations and kept his eyes open for who might be interviewed next.

What are the odds on that? How technology has transformed the betting industry

From our UK edition

Sixteen years ago last month, the organisers of a party at the Sports Cafe on Haymarket heralded a sports betting revolution. What they launched — known that evening as ‘open market’ but soon renamed ‘exchange’ betting by the media — predicted that technological innovation facilitated by the internet would herald the death of the bookmaker and offer punters the opportunity to take control. But in January this year the business they created merged with a traditional bookie that was very much alive and kicking. The revolution, it seems, was aborted. Or perhaps the revolution still continues. The betting industry has certainly changed beyond all recognition since June 2000.

Why the new match-fixing claims could rock the world of tennis

From our UK edition

The world’s tennis elite is up in arms. Roger Federer wants to see proof, demanding that the people behind “allegations that match-fixing is rife” should name names.  Andy Murray has criticised the practice of betting companies sponsoring tournaments. And Murray’s former coach Mark Petchey thinks that betting on lower-grade tournaments should be outlawed - although it isn’t clear how he proposes to enforce that on syndicates in Hong Kong. They are all missing the point. Perhaps that’s because (or why) the entire media cohort did the same thing yesterday, running story after interview about the possibility that tennis matches get thrown for money.

Is Ed Miliband really prepared to risk £8.27 billion on an election stunt?

From our UK edition

It's a common assumption that non-doms pay little tax. It's certainly an assumption made by Ed Miliband, who has announced plans to scrap the non-dom status for long-term residents. 'There are 116,000 non-doms costing hundreds of millions of pounds to our country. It can no longer be justified and it makes Britain a tax haven for the few,' he said. But how does Miliband explain the £8.27 billion of income tax and NIC paid by non-doms in 2012-13? The average non-dom claiming the remittance basis pays £132,762 of income tax per annum, 25 times more than the average British tax payer. Whether Miliband likes to admit it or not, non-doms make a significant direct financial contribution to the country.

Why is it ok to publish Brooks Newmark’s naked selfies but not Jennifer Lawrence’s?

From our UK edition

Revenge porn is about to become a criminal offence, punishable by up to two years in prison. As the Guardian reports, ‘there has been mounting political pressure to outlaw the practice of humiliating former lovers by posting intimate pictures of them online.’ But the front page of the Sun on Sunday is fine, presumably? Because what is the difference between revenge porn between private individuals, and selling the media a selfie that you exchanged with some MP? On what basis are photos of Brooks Newmark fair game for the front page of a newspaper, in a world where posting embarrassing private pictures of your former lover on Facebook is about to become a criminal offence?