Lance Christensen

Lance Christensen is the Vice President of Government Affairs & Education Policy at the California Policy Center

California’s Prop 50 passed because grifters were scared of losing their grift

While it's premature for a full autopsy of the No on Prop 50 campaign, the opposition clearly faced structural hurdles that went well beyond Governor Gavin Newsom's thinly veiled presidential ambitions. The pundits are quick to make it a referendum on President Donald Trump, but upon deeper inspection, we’re seeing big government going all in to retain power behind the Sierra Curtain. The grifters are scared of losing their grift The progressive left rallied effectively to boost Newsom’s ego-play because its core supporters, especially government unions and allied special interest, depend on taxpayer resources to sustain their influence, giving them strong incentives to mobilize.

Newsom

The folly of Newsom’s redistricting plans

"Vanity of vanities, saith the preacher; all is vanity" may very well be the epitaph of Gavin Newsom's political career when he leaves office in January 2027. Driven by his presidential ambitions, California's governor is torching a quarter-billion taxpayer dollars on a redistricting scheme that would make Elbridge Gerry himself blush. What Newsom calls "fighting Trump," voters increasingly recognize as #GavinMandering, a transparent attempt to override the independent redistricting commission they approved to end exactly this kind of political manipulation. The political implications are staggering, not just for California but for the future of Democratic Party credibility nationwide.

Newsom