James Forsyth

James Forsyth

James Forsyth is former political editor of The Spectator.

Brown should go early for Labour’s sake but he won’t

From our UK edition

Nearly everyone in Westminster says the same thing when you ask them if there will be an election early in 2009: Brown should call one but he won’t. The thinking goes that the worst probable result for Labour early next year is a narrow Tory majority and the best one is Labour as the largest party in the Commons. By contrast in 2010, Labour could get absolutely shell-shacked. The new YouGov poll today has Labour no longer rising in the polls, it is steady on 35 while the Tories are up one to 42—Jonathan Isaby thinks that this trend is enough to see off the prospect of an early election. But there is reason to believe that these numbers will get substantially better for the Tories over the next 12 months.

The faith of Obama: a secular messiah

From our UK edition

This Christmas is the last occasion when Barack Obama will have time to reflect and think at his own pace for the next four, and probably eight, years. It offers him a brief gap between the crazed schedule of the campaign — last year he was campaigning on Boxing Day — and the pressures of the presidency. As Obama relaxes in his native Hawaii, he will be preparing for a job that will make the challenges of the campaign insignificant in comparison. After he takes the Oath of Office he will find himself in the unique position of being both the most powerful man on earth and at the mercy of events. Problems anywhere in the world will have a tendency to become his problem very quickly. Obama will be sworn in with his hand on the Bible.

Is Mandelson really going to become Lord of the Dance?

From our UK edition

This story seems almost too good to be true: Peter Mandelson is, apparently, going to make a guest appearance on Strictly Come Dancing tomorrow night. The Belfast Telegraph reports that: “The Secretary of State for Business is expected to take to the dancefloor alongside celebrities Lisa Snowdon, Rachel Stevens and Tom Chambers to wow the crowd in a Christmas extravaganza.” The plus side for Mandelson in going on is that it will do much to soften his image and help elevate him above the political fray. The risk is that he’ll be seen to be tangoing while the economy crashes. Who’d have thought at the beginning of the year that at the end of it we’d be speculating about Lord Mandelson appearing on Strictly Come Dancing?

Class confusion

From our UK edition

The Daily Mirror is, to put it mildly, obsessed with David Cameron’s social background. But Paul Routledge demonstrates an alarming lack of knowledge when he fumes that: “Deregulating the City, so bankers could steal the cash and get rich was [Thatcher’s] idea. Cameron is hard-wired with them. They're his tribe. He gets his money from them, mixes with them, married one, and went to school with the b******s.” Leaving aside that the old aristocracy and those who profited from the big bang and other Thatcherite reforms are actually fairly distinct groups, Samantha Cameron is not and never has been a banker. More broadly, Routledge should decide who his enemy is.

A question of priorities

From our UK edition

At his press conference this morning, Gordon Brown said that he would reply to David Cameron’s letter about meeting with the civil service in due course. It is an improvement on a spokesman’s answer last weekend that, “The prime minister is in Afghanistan, so it is not top of his list of priorities” But it is still ridiculous and petty that the Prime Minister won’t sign off on these meetings that play an important role in ensuring the smooth transfer of power when the governing party loses an election, something that we can surely all agree is in the national interest.

Mandelson and Charlie Whelan <em>have</em> met

From our UK edition

The enmity between the Blair and Brown camps seemed to be perfectly captured by the fact that Charlie Whelan had to resign after Mandelson’s first resignation. The Blairites were convinced that Whelan had leaked the story and the principle of an eye for an eye and a tooth for tooth demanded that Whelan go too. It is only under the most compelling circumstances that you could imagine the two men working together again. That’s why the rumour that the two had met in Downing Street caused such excitement last weekend; it appeared to be an indication that general election planning was under way. The rumour was so heavily denied that it was pulled from the papers.

The new CW

From our UK edition

One of the political winners of the last quarter of this year has been Ed Miliband. He gave one of the best speeches of the conference season and then was promoted in Brown’s reshuffle to one of the sexiest portfolios in government. James Macintyre in his predictions for 2009 says: “Ed Miliband will emerge as the up-and-coming politician of 2009 and come to be regarded as Brown's natural successor.” One of the smartest commentators on the centre-left said something similar to me the other day citing Ed’s popularity across the party and the fact that the political energy is now on the more statist left where Ed has always been. His brother David, pretty anonymous since the banana incident, is rapidly becoming the other Miliband.

One meeting Peter Mandelson isn’t invited to

From our UK edition

Westminster is in awe of Peter Mandelson’s power. There is no doubt that he has almost unparalleled access and a remarkably wide-ranging remit; as Rachel Sylvester noted he sits on 33 of 39 cabinet committees. But it seems there are still some Brownites who are not yet ready to welcome him into the inner circle. Kevin Maguire, no friend of Mandelson, reports in his New Statesman diary  that: “The great guessing game over the date of the election has overlooked a regular gathering in No 10 on Wednesday afternoons.

The Osborne general election predictor says it is dead-level between Cameron and Brown

From our UK edition

In 2004, George Osborne wrote a piece for The Spectator setting out ‘The 13 keys to Number 10’. It was adapted from one of those American guides that predict who will win presidential elections. In 2004, Osborne predicted Tory victory using it but that was more due to some scoring decisions that were based more on loyalty than reality. Indeed, going through it in a more sober fashion would have given you the correct result. Anyway, here are the 13 keys and my thoughts on who has the edge on each: 1. Real per capita economic growth during the parliament equals or exceeds the mean growth during the previous two parliaments. No. 2. The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.

Comic – but not in the way intended

From our UK edition

This press release from the Tories just landed in my inbox: Commenting on Harriet Harman’s comparison of Gordon Brown to Superman, Shadow Cabinet member, Chris Grayling, said: “Gordon Brown is the Lex Luthor and not the Superman of British politics.  He gets us into a deep mess and all his ideas about how to get us out of it just aren’t working.” ENDS Notes to Editors Lex Luthor is a fictional character that appears in comic books published by DC Comics. The character first appeared in Action Comics #23 (Apr. 1940), and was created by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster. Luthor is described as "a power-mad, evil scientist" with incredible technological prowess. His goals typically on killing Superman, usually as a stepping stone to world domination.

Three suggestions for how the Tories can get their groove back

From our UK edition

How the Tories can get back on the front foot was the talk of the Christmas parties and bars of Westminster last night. There’s a general feeling that even though the Tories lead in the polls and the political fundamentals favour them, they are not doing as well as they should be and that they need to improve their poll standing if voices in the party are not to start sounding off. I suspect that a lot of Coffee Housers would like to see the leadership rip up its whole playbook. That’s not going to happen and it would be a mistake if it did: a string of flip-flops would add to the feeling that the Tories are adrift in the crisis. There is, though, plenty of room for fine-tuning.

PMQs live blog | 17 December 2008

From our UK edition

Gordon Brown is in Iraq today, avoiding the final PMQs of term, so we have Harman versus Hague again. Contrary to what people expected, Harman has held her own in these encounters. The Tory benches could certainly do with cheering up today, though. 12:05 Harman starts off with condolences for the family of the British solider who died in Afghanistan and informs the House that Brown will make a statement to the House on his return from Iraq. 12:06 Harman promises to change the law to force energy companies to pass on the fall in fuel prices if necessary. 12.07 Hague gets in his first gag of the session, joking that seeing as the national security sensitive information that British troops will leave Iraq was leaked they are surprised that no one has been arrested. 12.

Not the Christmas present Cameron wanted

From our UK edition

The latest ICM poll for the Guardian has the Tories dropping below forty percent. The party is down seven points on last month at 38 percent but it is still five points ahead of Labour.  The Lib Dems are on 19. It seems that it is doubts about their economic competence which is pulling the Tories down: Brown has an 11 point lead over Cameron on the question of who is most likely to get the economy back on track. He also has the edge on who is most likely to make the right decisions in tough circumstances and, in a reversal from two years ago, Brown is rated as the more honest leader. However, Cameron still has the advantage on who has the most potential as Prime Minister suggesting that Tory fortunes might recover once the crisis eases.

There’s a really easy way for Brown to kill off the early election speculation 

From our UK edition

Labour insiders have been busy pouring buckets of cold water over al the chatter about an early election. They clearly realise how damaging any suggestion that the Prime Minister is playing this crisis for partisan advantage would be to their prospects. Certainly, the one who told Ben Brogan, “No chance. There's more chance of getting Gordon and David Cameron to record a duet of Rockin' Around The Christmas Tree,” deserves marks for originality. But there is only one definitive way for Labour to stop all this speculation: have Brown rule out an election in 2009. At the moment, all we have is off-the-record denials from unnamed officials. Brown’s own statements have left him some, if not much, wriggle room.

Another sign that Labour is gearing up for an early election in 2009

From our UK edition

Iain Dale has heard from a friend of his in the ad trade that Labour is buying up advertising space for January. This is going to take the rumours about an early election to the next level following on from The News of the World story that never was about election planning meetings in Downing Street and Trevor Kavanagh’s speculation this morning about a February poll. The argument for Brown going early is that he needs to go during the crisis stage of the recession and before it is evident whether or not the measures he has taken have worked. But the danger for him is that by once again flirting with an early election he reminds the public why they so lost faith in him last autumn. To deter Brown, the Tories need to start talking about this at every opportunity.

Reasons to disregard the “parallels” with 1992

From our UK edition

There’s a lot of talk in Westminster at the moment about the parallels between now and 1992. Those who think that Brown can win the next election argue that 1992 shows how a governing party can win in a downturn and from behind. But looking at the polling from 1992, which admittedly got the final result rather wrong, shows a slightly different story. Two of the last three polls before Major named the date of the election had things dead even and the other had Labour ahead by only a single point. The Tories are in a far better position now than Labour was then. If you think that Brown might go in March — the date that I hear bandied around most frequently - then we are four months away from an election.

From hug a hoodie to hang a banker

From our UK edition

David Cameron’s speech this morning was a clever and important piece of political positioning. By calling for the full force of the law to be brought to bear on those in the City who have acted illegally, Cameron is moving to defuse the idea that the Tories are on the side of the bankers not the people. They need to do this because Labour are just itching to make a guilt by association charge stick against the Tories—just count the number of times you hear Labour MPs refer to ‘the Tories’ friends in the City.’ As Jackie Ashley writes this morning, “the jibes about Eton and Bullingdon connections may be cheap politics, but are none the less effective for all that. Cameron’s call is also the right thing to do.

Today’s star

From our UK edition

The cost to the taxpayer of public sector pensions and how much more generous they are than private sectors ones is going to become an increasingly big political issue in the coming years. The deal that Alan Johnson brokered with the public sector unions back in 2005 ducked pretty much all of the tough issues and did little to reduce their huge cost to the taxpayer. This morning on the Today Programme, Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union, was defending public sector pensions by arguing that they are small compensation for the low pay that public sector workers receive.

No marks for taxpayer value

From our UK edition

If anyone doubts the crazy excesses of the quango culture read the Mail on Sunday’s report on Ken Boston, who has finally resigned as head of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority over the SATS marking debacle. Boston was paid more than seven times what his predecessor was. What on earth was the justification for this kind of salary jump? It beggars belief that the market rate for the head of a curriculum and exams body had jumped by that amount in five years. The people who agreed to this deal clearly had scant regard to taxpayer value. The Mail reports that Boston is not alone in receiving a vastly better deal: more than 80 other quango heads have received large pay rises under Labour.

Brown should stop being so petty

From our UK edition

In Britain there is no transition period for a new government to bed down in. Instead, the leader of the opposition becomes Prime Minister as soon as they have been to see the Queen after their party has won an election. Since the 1960s oppositions have had discussions with civil servants in the lead up to polling day in an attempt to ensure that they could hit the ground running if elected and to get them up to speed on various issues. These meetings helped mitigate the potentially damaging effect of such an abrupt transfer of power. But Gordon Brown has so far delayed giving permission for these talks to begin even though there will have to be an election in the next 18 months. This is not a sexy issue.