James Forsyth

James Forsyth

James Forsyth is former political editor of The Spectator.

Could Brown survive this effort to oust him, only to be forced out in the autumn?

From our UK edition

John Rentoul in The Independent on Sunday argues that Brown won’t be forced out this time but will be in the autumn.  Here’s the crux of his argument: “When he faces his next convulsion, probably in the autumn, the timetable will look very different. Alan Johnson will be able to come in and promise an early general election – in the spring of next year; that is, roughly, when there has to be an election anyway and nobody has anything to lose. Then, the only calculation that matters is, as James Purnell put it in his resignation letter, whether Brown's "continued leadership makes a Conservative victory more not less likely", or, as Stephen Byers asked more bluntly: "Is Gordon Brown a winner or a loser?

More Labour members want Brown to go than to stay

From our UK edition

A new Channel 4 / YouGov poll has further weakened the Prime Minister’s position. It shows that more Labour members want him out by the autumn than want him to stay and fight the election. Party members are usually the last group to turn against the leader so the numbers are particularly harmful and may steel the nerves of a few of those wavering about whether to sign the letter. Just under a third of members think that Labour cannot win a general election under Brown. Two-thirds say Brown is a bad communicator and a majority think Labour would be better off if Blair was still in charge. When it comes to the question of who should succeed Brown, 35 percent favour Alan Johnson and 12 percent David Miliband. No one else makes it into double figures.

As Tony Blair would say, ‘Weak, weak, weak’

From our UK edition

Events moved so fast yesterday it was easy to overlook the most important development of the day: Gordon Brown couldn’t move his Chancellor. Every Brown supporter who has fanned out across the media in the past few days has stressed that Brown should stay PM because he is the man best placed to lead Britain through the downturn. But Brown is now so weak that he cannot have the Chancellor who he thinks is best placed to help him do this. Brown’s denial that he wanted to move Darling at his press conference was risible. Brown had umpteen opportunities to put an end to the stories about Darling being replaced by Balls at the Treasury and never took one of them.   As Andrew Grice notes, the Brown-Darling working relationship will  now be fraught to say the least.

The Cabinet fall for another set of cheap promises about Brown changing how he does business

From our UK edition

The Guardian’s tick-tock of how Peter Mandelson and Number 10 prevented a full-scale Cabinet revolt after news broke of James Purnell’s resignation reveals just how easily the Cabinet were brought off: “These ministers believe they have won two assurances. First, that cabinet ministers such as Alistair Darling will not again find themselves briefed against. There was deep anger in cabinet when Darling found himself being referred to in the past tense by Brown earlier in the week. Second, ministers believe they have won assurances that Brown will make more of an effort to consult ministers and backbenchers, ensuring no repeat of the YouTube fiasco when he announced a series of unilateral proposals on expenses.

The rebels haven’t gone away

From our UK edition

Nick Raynsford just delivered perhaps the most articulate on-the record version of the rebels’ case that we have heard. Raynsford stressed that periods where government have huge majorities and the opposition are in chaos are not conducive to proper Parliamentary scrutiny—pointing both to Thatcher’s second term and Blair’s first two. Interestingly, a lot of the Labour people who have spoken out today are veterans. Perhaps, it is because they have less to lose. But, I think, more important is the fact that they understand the consequences of the kind of defeat that Brown is leading the party to.

Byers and Flint to speak out Monday

From our UK edition

Andrew Sparrow reports that  Stephen Byers and Caroline Flint will address a Progress debate on the future of the Labour party on Monday. I somehow suspect that both of them will be saying that Brown should be part of the party's past not its present or future.

The left needs to come to the aid of the party<br />

From our UK edition

The Tories are cock-a-hoop this morning. They now have the prospect of a year of a battering a government with a Prime Minister who is so weak he can’t reshuffle his Cabinet as he wishes and a Chancellor who everyone knows does not command the confidence of Number 10. If Labour is polling in the low twenties/high teens now, how low will it be after a year of lame duck government? As one Labour fixer on the left of the party said to me earlier this week, ‘there’s no constitutional requirement for there to be a Labour party.’ As Matt writes, the effort to portray those dissatisfied with Brown as Blairite-ultras is in full flow. But the truth is the discontent goes far wider than that.

The worst of all possible worlds for Labour

From our UK edition

Brown didn’t have the cojones to makes balls Chancellor and so one potential trigger for multiple Cabinet resignations has been avoided. But the country now has a Chancellor who everyone—including the markets—knows is not the Prime Minister’s first choice for the job. What authority will Darling now have when he pronounces on economic matters? Brown by backing away from this confrontation has confirmed that he knows how weak he is. He has proved that he is a lame duck Prime Minister. Tony Blair's 'weak, weak, weak' jibe springs to mind. Alan Johnson by taking the Home Office has bound himself in more closely to Brown. The rebels will now have to force a vacancy or a contest before Johnson can get into the game.

RUMOUR: David Miliband to resign Friday

From our UK edition

Update: Nick Robinson on the BBC saying Miliband won't go. Update 2: This Week is saying that Miliband and Hutton have said they disagree with Purnell's decision. The word on the street which I haven't confirmed is that David Miliband will go tomorrow.

Sing a song for Labour

From our UK edition

Late last week, we asked who should sing for Labour? (There had been reports that the party was having trouble finding a big name musical act for its annual fundraising do). Thomas Fry came up with the clever suggestion of Gordon Brown singing The Beatles’ ‘I don’t want to spoil the party so I’ll go’. There’s no doubt that would be music to the ears of most Labour MPs. The idea of having D-Ream reprise ‘Things Can Only Get Better’ was also neat. But the winner is Boudica for her suggestion of having a Stones tribute band sing, ‘The Last Time’. Boudica if you want to send us an email with your address, we’ll wing you a bottle of champagne.

Brown’s Balls-up

From our UK edition

The question of whether Brown makes Balls Chancellor is still generally regarded as the key to what happens next. But it is worth pointing out that there is a huge danger to Brown in backing down now that he has gone so far: talking about Darling’s tenure at the Treasury in the past tense and refusing to confirm that he’ll keep him in post. If Brown fails to follow through, it will be clear that this is because he could not command the support of his Cabinet if he did make the appointment. Churchill’s comment about Suez springs to mind, ‘I wouldn’t have dared start but I certainly wouldn’t have dared stop.’ A display of weakness from Brown in the current circumstances would be provocative.

Suspended animation

From our UK edition

In public, the pause button has been pressed on the plot against Brown. The broadcasters cannot report because of election law and Labour MPs are keeping their counsel until the polls close. Of course, behind the scenes the plotting--from all I'm hearing--is continuing apace.  There are rumours circling about which Minister, MP or party grandee will be the first off the blocks after ten o’clock with a call for Brown to go. There will be very little overnight counting and declaration, so anyone who says their bit tonight can be fairly certain that they will leads the news in the morning; turning the pressure on Brown up another notch at the start of what is sure to be another difficult day for him.

Obama misses the problems behind the problems

From our UK edition

Obama’s speech to the ‘Muslim world’ in Egypt was full of necessary fictions. But more substantively it set out what Obama sees as seven areas where progress must be made if tensions are to be eased: the fight against violent extremism, Israel / Palestine, Iran’s nuclear ambition, democracy, religious freedom, womens’ rights and economic development. Missing from the speech was a clear appreciation that violent extremism comes out of an extremist ideology. Violent extremism cannot be defeated until the ideology that lies behind it is tackled. It was also, to my mind, a mistake to relegate democracy to fourth place in Obama’s list.

Labour behind UKIP in final pre European election poll

From our UK edition

YouGov has just released a European Election voting intention poll and it has Labour in third behind UKIP. The poll has the Tories on 26, UKIP 18, Labour on 16, the Lib Dems 15, the Greens 10 and the BNP on 5. However, if those not certain to vote are included the numbers become the Tories 37, Labour 21, Lib Dem 19 and UKIP 8. So, who can get their vote out is going to be key. It is hard to imagine that Labour supporters are going to feel particularly enthusiastic about voting for their party in the current circumstances. Obviously, what Labour gets and where it finishes is the politically most important factor of the results. But if the Tories score below 30, they received 27 percent of the vote in these elections in 2004, then there will be some disquiet in Conservative circles.

Straw praises Smith and slams Blears

From our UK edition

Jack Straw has just been on Channel 4 News drawing contrasts between Jacqui Smith’s ‘dignified’ exit and Hazel Blears’. Straw made clear that he didn’t think Smith had leaked the news of her own departure, saying he had known about it for a month. Straw seemed happy to imply that he shared the rage that many Labour members are feeling towards Blears right now. There is no doubt that by resigning on the eve of these elections Blears has cost Labour votes and councillors their seats. The next question is how does Blears respond to the briefings against her both public and private. I slightly expect there now to be a lull in public, in private things will continue to build, until the polls close tomorrow night.