Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Neil Parish investigated over Commons porn claims

From our UK edition

Neil Parish has now been suspended from the Conservative whip after referring himself to Parliament’s complaints process following allegations he watched pornography in the Commons chamber. The Tiverton and Honiton MP spoke to the chief whip today and had the whip removed pending the outcome of the investigation. Two female Conservative MPs alleged earlier this week that they had seen a colleague watching porn in the chamber while sitting next to a female minister. The claims were naturally explosive and have dominated Westminster ever since. They have opened up the debate on misogyny and sexism in Parliament more widely.  It has led to MPs making separate allegations against other figures in parliament.

Is Pestminster back?

From our UK edition

17 min listen

This has been a bad week for the reputation of the House of Commons. From inappropriate comments toward female MPs, three cabinet ministers facing sexual misconduct claims and one MP accused of watching pornography in the chamber. Can anything be done to change this grotesque culture? And is it Westminster specific or an issue with society at large?Isabel Hardman talks to James Forsyth and Katy Balls.

PMQs: The return of Pestminster?

From our UK edition

Prime Minister's Questions opened with Sir Keir Starmer and Boris Johnson agreeing that the anonymous briefing about Angela Rayner was unacceptable. The Labour leader speculated that Johnson would have ‘whipped his backbenchers to scream and shout – and that's fine’, before demanding that he send a ‘clear message that there's no place for sexism or misogyny’. Johnson has been consistent on this point, rushing to distance himself from the story as soon as it emerged. It has, though, sparked a wider debate about sexism in misogyny in parliament which is likely to dominate the agenda into next week too: on which more below.

The dark side of the ‘protect the NHS’ slogan

From our UK edition

The High Court's ruling today that the government broke the law on the discharge of patients to care homes in the early days of the pandemic further undermines the claim by the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock that ministers had thrown a 'protective ring' around the sector. The case was brought by two relatives, Cathy Gardner and Fay Harris, of care home residents who died after testing positive for Covid. Their argument was that six policies in place at the start of the pandemic represented 'one of the most egregious and devastating policy failures in the modern era'. The fathers of Gardner and Harris were among the 20,000 people in care homes who died after testing positive between March and June 2020.

Can the Cabinet really solve the ‘cost of living’ crisis?

From our UK edition

13 min listen

Today a pre-briefing on what Boris Johnson plans to say to the Cabinet about the cost of living crisis was released. He wants them to brainstorm ideas to ease the pain felt by the British public in the face of rising prices of food and energy. The catch, is these have to be non-fiscal ways. Isabel Hardman talks to Katy Balls and James Forsyth about how effective these plans could be and how they may be received by the voters. To keep up to date with the world of Westminster, sign up for unrivalled insight and analysis with Isabel Hardman’s Evening Blend newsletter, delivered to your inbox every weekday evening. Sign up at spectator.

What does Macron’s victory mean for Anglo-French relations?

From our UK edition

12 min listen

French President, Emmanuel Macron secured victory over the weekend. But with the election over, will we see a reset in relations between the UK and France? Apart from support for Ukraine, there has been little the governments on either side of the Channel have agreed on. Katy Balls is joined by Isabel Hardman and James Forsyth to test the temperature of these turbulent political waters, as well as giving a look forward to our own local elections in May.

The new inquiry proves partygate isn’t going away

From our UK edition

The Commons has approved – without a vote – a motion calling for Boris Johnson to face an investigation into whether he misled the House over partygate. Labour's motion, supported by other opposition parties, means the Privileges Committee will start an inquiry after the Metropolitan Police's work on the lockdown parties has concluded. There was no vote because the government opposition to this motion, which was still active even this morning collapsed at the last minute, and it was easy from the debate to see why. It lacked the drama of a vote at the end, but the speeches themselves compensated for that.

Boris Johnson U-turns on partygate vote

From our UK edition

MPs are now likely to pass the motion referring Boris Johnson to a privileges committee inquiry into whether he misled parliament after the government dropped its opposition. Now, Conservative MPs have a free vote and are on a one-line whip, with their party whips instructing them that the Prime Minister is ‘happy for the Commons to decide on any referrals to the Privilege Committee’ and that they are not going to move the amendment they tabled trying to delay the entire thing until the publication of the Sue Gray report. There was a hope in No. 10 that there would not even be a vote and it could just be nodded through if Labour decided not to press the issue.

PMQs: Starmer’s attacks are working

From our UK edition

Prime Minister's Questions took a rather bizarre twist this afternoon when the Labour leader ended up demanding Boris Johnson apologise to the Archbishop of Canterbury. The Prime Minister reportedly complained to Tory MPs last night about Justin Welby's criticism of the government's Rwanda asylum policy. Sources at the meeting said Johnson had claimed Welby was ‘less vociferous’ about Vladimir Putin than he had about this policy – something the Church of England has already condemned as a 'disgraceful slur'. Johnson did not apologise, instead saying:  I was slightly taken aback for the government to be criticised over the policy that we have devised to end the deaths at sea in the Channel as a result of cruel criminal gangs.

Boris says sorry. Is it enough?

From our UK edition

13 min listen

Boris Johnson faced MPs today for the first time since he was issued a fine for breaking lockdown rules. He apologised in the Commons, but maintained that he did not know he was breaking any rules at the time. Is that enough?Katy Balls speaks to Isabel Hardman and James Forsyth.

Johnson’s partygate apology ploy

From our UK edition

Boris Johnson bundled his Commons apology for breaking Covid laws together with an update on Ukraine because he wanted to try to draw a line under the matter. He spent a couple of minutes reiterating his apology that he'd already given in response to his fixed penalty notice, before performing a handbrake turn and saying: And it is precisely because I know that so many people are angry and disappointed, that I feel an even greater sense of obligation to deliver on the priorities of the British people, and to respond in the best traditions of our country to Putin’s barbaric onslaught against Ukraine.

What’s the real point of Priti Patel’s Rwanda migrant plan?

From our UK edition

Why is Priti Patel trying to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda? Is it to stop so many of them drowning in the Channel after their people smugglers' inflatable boats have sunk? Is it to help develop the Rwandan economy? Or is this purely a political move? The Home Secretary naturally claimed the first two justifications for her new policy when she gave a statement about it in the Commons this afternoon, and faced accusations from the Opposition that she was really pursuing the third. The most stinging criticism came not from the Labour frontbench, though, but from one of Patel's own Conservative predecessors as Home Secretary, former prime minister Theresa May.

MPs set for partygate vote

From our UK edition

The Speaker Lindsay Hoyle has just confirmed that MPs will be able to debate a motion on whether Boris Johnson misled parliament over whether Covid laws were broken in Downing Street. Lindsay Hoyle said that Keir Starmer will be able to table the motion for debate on Thursday, but it is not clear yet what that motion will be. Indeed, Hoyle was very careful to say that he has no jurisdiction over the Ministerial Code and whether Johnson has broken it – or indeed whether the Prime Minister has committed a contempt. Hoyle was very careful to say that he has no jurisdiction over the Ministerial Code and whether Johnson has broken it So we know that MPs will be debating Johnson's conduct and the consequences of that on Thursday morning.

Is the government’s Rwandan immigration plan viable?

From our UK edition

12 min listen

This week the government has announced a pilot scheme meant to address the increasing number of asylum seekers dangerously crossing the English Channel. While some have criticised this plan as expensive and immoral it could prove to be popular among large swathes of Conservative voters.Cindy Yu talks with Isabel Hardman and Katy Balls about this new policy as well as giving us a partygate update.

Excl: NHS tries to ditch the focus on ‘normal births’ after scandal

From our UK edition

It's only been two weeks since the Ockenden report on the maternity scandal at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust came out. That report criticised – among many other things – a focus on ‘normal birth’ and a low Caesarean section rate which had harmed some of the mothers and babies in the cases it had investigated. Job adverts give the impression that some sections of the NHS aren’t prepared to learn the lessons from Ockenden Since then, though, there have still been job adverts going out from other NHS trusts for midwives who are interested in ‘normality’ – the common term for a vaginal delivery, preferably without instrumental intervention.

Has Boris got away with it?

From our UK edition

14 min listen

After the news of the fixed penalty notices, Boris Johnson, his wife Carrie Johnson and Rishi Sunak paid their fines and issued a public apology. For Boris, the reaction has been surprisingly positive compared to the beginning of the year. The majority of cabinet ministers have come out in support of the Prime Minister, but there are still some voices of discontent. Nigel Mills was the first Tory MP to announce he no longer has faith in the Prime Minister and thinks he should resign, who will be next?

Boris thinks he can ride this scandal out

From our UK edition

Boris Johnson has now apologised for receiving a fixed penalty notice for attending a lockdown-busting party. In a clearly very carefully scripted statement read to camera, the Prime Minister also made it clear he hadn't thought he was breaking the rules by attending the gathering in the Cabinet Room, which lasted 'less than ten minutes'. 'I have to say it did not occur to me that this might have been a breach of the rules, he said. But, he added, 'of course the police have found otherwise and I fully accept the outcome of their investigation'. He said he had 'paid the fine and I once again offer a full apology'. Johnson clearly thinks that his defence of inadvertently breaking the rules is sufficient for his party (though not good enough for the police).

Boris and Rishi fined: what happens next?

From our UK edition

15 min listen

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak have been told that they are going to be fixed penalty notices by the Metropolitan Police over parties held in Downing Street. The Chancellor has already had a tough week – might he now resign? Could Tory MPs push the Prime Minister out of No. 10? Isabel Hardman speaks to Fraser Nelson and Katy Balls.

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak fined over partygate

From our UK edition

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak are both to receive fixed penalty notices for attending lockdown parties, it has just emerged. The police fines for breaking Covid laws, which these two men created, throw everything around the Prime Minister and the Chancellor into the air. Previously, many Tory MPs had said this would be a resigning matter for a serving PM to be found to have broken the law. A No. 10 spokesperson confirmed the fines, saying: ‘The Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer have today received notification that the Metropolitan police intend to issue them with fixed penalty notices.