Isabel Hardman

Finally, the copper-bottomed, unvarnished Programme for Government Update, aka the Secret Audit, has landed. You can read the full document here, but in summary, it's not immediately very helpful. It is laid out as a point-by-point 'analysis' of how the government is meeting its pledges in the Coalition Agreement, but the wording is such that you can't actually tell whether there are any areas on which it has failed. Reading this document, you'd think everything was pretty hunky-dory with the government as there is no assessment of whether each pledge is completed, underway, or forgotten. This is the assessment of the House of Lords reform pledge: We published a draft Bill and White Paper on House of Lords reform in May 2011.

Number 10 officials have been working on the mid-term review since the autumn, with what the Prime Minister's spokesman described today as a 'long-term intention' to publish the awkward annex. But even though the review itself was delayed from the real mid-term point of the Coalition to this Monday, it doesn't seem to have given those working on it sufficient time to get the annex ready for publication at the same time. The PM's spokesman said: 'It has been a long standing intention to publish the annex. What we needed to do was to copper-bottom it.' The implication was that there was a great deal of copper to put on the bottom of this point-by-point analysis of the government's progress against the pledges in the Coalition agreement.

The Coalition's decision to publish a Mid-Term review reminded some of Tony Blair's ill-fated annual reports, which strangely stopped appearing after 2000. Blair's last report embarrassed him because it contained mistakes: the danger of this document was that while lauding the government's progress to date, it might also have to accept a number of failures. That wasn't the case on Monday: in fact, the report itself was largely a paraphrase of every government policy announced so far, which was quite Blairite in itself as it sought to dress up old announcements as new plans. There was no admission of failures, or at least not until David Cameron's adviser Patrick Rock was snapped carrying a memo warning that the annex assessing those targets could lead to 'unfavourable copy'.

Coupled with Lord Strathclyde's resignation over the way the Coalition worked in the House of Lords, Sarah Teather's announcement that she will rebel against the government tomorrow is extremely poor timing. Today was supposed to be about unity, the Coalition working well together in the national interest. Now there are suggestions that this unity isn't visible in the Upper Chamber, and that senior Lib Dems aren't quite as ecstatic about key policies as Nick Clegg might try to argue. Ever since she went AWOL on the day of a vote on the benefit cap, Teather was a rebellion waiting to happen.

It is no great surprise that Hacked Off director Brian Cathcart believes the government can't be trusted to implement Leveson: the Prime Minister made very clear on the day of the report's publication that he didn't believe governments could be trusted to regulate the press via statute. But what is interesting about the draft bill that the media reform pressure group has published this morning is that it claims to be the most faithful implementation of the Leveson recommendations: more faithful, even, than that proposed by the Labour party.

The Coalition reaches its proalition peak today with the publication of the mid-term review, but Downing Street strategists are keen to spin out the good feeling for as long as possible. David Cameron and Nick Clegg will launch the review in their first joint appearance in Downing Street since December 2010, but the details of many of the measures on childcare, transport, housing and pensions won't come today. Instead, we'll see a trickle of announcements over the next couple of months. The leaders have already published a foreword to the review document, which starts by restating the Coalition's central mission: deficit reduction.