Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Lord Rennard: The key questions

From our UK edition

As James observed last night, Nick Clegg's statement on the Rennard allegations raised more questions than it answered. Lord Rennard continues to strenuously deny the claims of sexual harassment made on Channel 4 News last week and in other reports since. But the problem is that when allegations were being made and rumours were circulating, nothing was done, regardless of whether those claims would have been proven or not. And as Nick Clegg hasn't closed down the row, here are five questions that the party and those examining it will want to answer: 1. There are discrepancies between the different accounts of when the Lib Dem leadership received the specific allegations from Channel 4.

Five key points from the Pollard Review evidence on Newsnight and Jimmy Savile

From our UK edition

There are over 3,000 pages of evidence in the cache of transcripts, emails, statements and texts for the Pollard Review released by the BBC today. Some of the interviews covered familiar old ground, such as Jeremy Paxman telling the inquiry that it was 'common gossip that Jimmy Savile liked, you know, young - it was always assumed to be girls'. But there are other points which are worth noting from today's release. There may well be others: some of the evidence, as the pictures below show, was heavily redacted. 1. Newsnight was poorly resourced This was a problem referred to by many of those who gave evidence to the inquiry.

Censor’s black pencil hovers over BBC’s Jimmy Savile review transcripts

From our UK edition

The BBC has released its (redacted) transcripts and other evidence from the Pollard Review, which examined the decision to drop Newsnight's Jimmy Savile investigation. There are thousands of pages of evidence, which you can read here, some with large sections which have fallen foul to the censor's black pencil, even though Jeremy Paxman in particular had made clear that he wanted his interview transcript published in full.

Big Brother cash machine campaign costs nearly £100k

From our UK edition

Remember those menacing HMRC eyes that Fraser found staring out at him from a cashpoint last month? Well, it turns out they're a pretty expensive pair of eyes. A Freedom of Information request by the TPA's Matt Sinclair returned this week, revealing that this cashpoint campaign on tax evasion cost just under £100,000. The response says: 'The total media spend for the Evasion ATM advertising campaign specified in your request was £95,930.40, excluding VAT. This amount was approved by the Cabinet Office. 'To set this figure in the correct context, the Government has made around £1 billion available to HMRC to tackle avoidance, evasion and fraud to bring in an extra £7 billion by 2014/15. The advertising in ATM machines is just one strand of this work.

Chancellor caught in the headlights on fuel prices

From our UK edition

George Osborne is getting used to the twice-yearly battle that precedes an autumn statement or a budget when motorists, newspapers and some of his own MPs start haranguing him on fuel. It's the Times' splash today, with petrol prices expected to rise to their highest-ever levels, and campaigners calling once again for the Chancellor to cancel September's fuel duty increase when he makes his Budget statement next month. As I reported back in January, Tory MPs want this Budget to be another cost-of-living statement, which, like the autumn, allows the Coalition to demonstrate that it is doing all it can to hack away at the major pressures on voters' wallets.

Labour could use Budget legislation to force mansion tax vote

From our UK edition

Labour's current plan to embarrass the Lib Dems over its clothes-stealing mansion tax policy is an Opposition Day debate in the Commons. But, in a mark of how serious the party is to score a political point on this matter, I understand that it is also considering tabling an amendment involving a mansion tax to the Finance Bill after the Budget. Labour sources tell me that this threat will be enacted if the government doesn't allocate time for an Opposition Day debate before the Budget. A source says: 'We want to be clear that we are serious about this. This is a test for the Lib Dems to see if they can keep just one of their promises. It's a test for Nick Clegg as leader.

Lib Dems get worked up about a vote that doesn’t matter

From our UK edition

It seems I rather underestimated Labour when I said their forthcoming Opposition Day vote on the mansion tax would be boring and unlikely to attract any Lib Dem support. The Staggers reported last night that Labour sources were planning to make the vote as amenable as possible to the Lib Dems by dropping any awkward references to 10p tax rates or any other wheeze that the junior coalition partner disagrees with. Meanwhile Lib Dem sources are saying they are waiting to see the wording before ruling anything out. But the point that this is not a crunch vote that will interest the public still stands, so why are the Lib Dems even bothering to wait for the motion?

How will the Tories sell more welfare cuts?

From our UK edition

David Cameron is making noises about further welfare cuts as he tours India, reports the FT's Kiran Stacey. This isn't surprising: the PM has got a gaggle of Cabinet ministers pecking at him and squawking about cutting DWP spending even more in order to protect policing and defence in the 2015/16 spending review, which will be settled in the next few months. But are we going to see the same pattern of decision-making and the same rhetoric on welfare spending as has emerged for previous budgets and autumn statements? This is how it has worked recently: Spending decisions approach. Nick Clegg (or an acolyte) says he's blocked further cuts to the welfare budget. Iain Duncan Smith makes a similar noise. The Treasury (or sometimes even the PM) starts flying kites on welfare cuts.

Maria Hutchings says what she thinks. But is she thinking what Eastleigh voters are thinking?

From our UK edition

One of the key strands of the Conservative campaign in Eastleigh is trust: not just because campaigners can remind voters about Chris Huhne, but thanks to a contrast they can draw between Maria Hutchings and Lib Dem candidate Mike Thornton. The party's latest poster underlines this: it accuses the Lib Dems of 'facing both ways on development' and contrasts quotes from Thornton on protecting green spaces and his voting record. The bottom of the poster says: 'Maria Hutchings has consistently campaigned with local residents against these developments.

On tax policy, to govern is to maintain the status quo

From our UK edition

To govern is to choose, wise people like to say when talking about policies which annoy voters but which might make good sense. Today we have another example of what happens when governments don't choose. The Public Accounts Committee has published another one of its fierce reports on tax, arguing that tax avoidance companies 'run rings around HMRC'. There's plenty of criticism in it for HMRC, with the committee finding that HMRC doesn't know how much it spends tackling tax avoidance, or whether the work that it does do is effective. But the tax system itself, unsurprisingly, doesn't get a good review either.

Labour’s mansion tax debate won’t be a crunch vote (or very interesting)

From our UK edition

So Labour is going to force a vote in the House of Commons on the mansion tax. It's the key announcement trailed as part of Ed Miliband's visit to Eastleigh today, and yet it's the sort of thing that only really excites people who look forward to hearings of the Public Accounts Committee rather than the average voter who has a more normal perspective on life. The idea behind these Opposition Day debates is that Labour flushes out any rebels or unhappy Lib Dems, or that its MPs can later tweet 'Lib Dems voted against their own policy in the Commons tonight #evil #nevertrustalibdemagain'. Miliband says that very thing today: 'And what about the Lib Dems? There could be a majority in the House of Commons when it votes on our proposal. But only if the Liberal Democrats vote with Labour.

Exclusive: MPs could debate controls for Bulgarian and Romanian migrants

From our UK edition

So far, MPs have only been able to raise concerns about the effects of the end of transitional controls for Bulgarian and Romanian migrants in departmental questions in the Commons. But one Tory is calling for a full backbench debate on the issue after recess. I understand that Mark Pritchard wants the government to extend transitional controls beyond 2013. He has applied for a debate, and tells me: 'I am pleased that the government is looking at the pull factors that will draw thousands of Bulgarian and Romanian migrants to the UK. However, time is running out and action rather than words are required. There also needs to be a recognition that there are also push factors and reducing pull factors alone will not be sufficient.

Nadine Dorries says Ipsa is ‘asleep on the bloody job’, but MPs’ pay and expenses will cause even more grief this year

From our UK edition

Nadine Dorries has vowed to 'go after' Ipsa today after the watchdog announced her expenses were under investigation. There will clearly be more to come on this, but the claims the Mid-Bedfordshire MP is making about Ipsa being 'asleep on the bloody job' by not noticing that a travel ticket receipt had accidentally been submitted twice won't come as a surprise to other MPs. Remember that Adam Afriyie's confidence about his coup (which I understand from friends that he remains very confident about) stems partly from the help he has given fellow Tories in fighting the current Ipsa system. Louise Mensch raises some of the problems that she identified with the system in her interview with the Standard today.

Exclusive: Tory MPs push government for French-style ‘civil union’ weddings

From our UK edition

Two Conservative MPs are pushing for the government to consider separating the civil functions of marriage from the religious as part of the same sex marriage bill, I understand. David Burrowes and Tim Loughton, who both voted against the legislation at second reading, have tabled an amendment to its first clause designed to spark a debate about whether Britain should have a system similar to France or South Africa, where the state controls the legal registration of marriages, but any wedding ceremony is down to religious institutions and venues (Hugo Rifkind extolled the benefits of this system earlier this year in The Spectator, and Matthew Parris similarly outlined the way South Africa managed to do it in his piece in December).

Sir John Major on how to win an EU renegotiation

From our UK edition

John Major knows a thing or two about naughty Tory MPs and Europe. So David Cameron would do well to listen to his Chatham House speech today in which he advised the PM to give up on the 'irreconcilables who are prepared to bring own any government or any Prime Minister in support of their opposition to the European Union'. He made two particularly strong points: 1. The Prime Minister should start preparing for the negotiation now. Major doesn't want the UK to leave the European Union, and neither does Cameron. So the former Tory Prime Minister gave a detailed briefing on how Cameron can avoid this. A referendum would only prevent a gradual drift towards the exit if the renegotiation preceding it is successful, and to ensure success, the PM needs to get planning right away.

No 10 attacks Miliband’s ‘admission of economic incompetence’

From our UK edition

Here's an interesting thing: Number 10 has released a statement on Ed Miliband's 10p tax rate pledge. The Downing Street press machine hasn't been in the habit of doing this sort of official reactive spinning, although this may be in part because Miliband's speeches thus far have been pretty light on anything you can actually react to. This is what a No 10 spokesman said: 'This is a stunning admission of economic incompetence from Ed Miliband and Ed Balls – that their decision in Government to scrap the 10p tax rate hurt millions of working families. People will never trust Labour again. The low income working people who lost out the most from Labour’s 10p tax hike now pay no tax at all thanks to this Government’s record increases in the tax free personal allowance.

Miliband steals a march on Tory tax campaign

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband has just started his economy speech in Bedford, so as he gets underway, here's a quick thought on his plan to reintroduce the 10p tax band. Doing this steals a march on a brewing Conservative campaign. Robert Halfon has been pushing over the past couple of months for the restoration of the 10p tax band to help those on low incomes. He's badged it the 'Great Gordon Brown Repeal Bill', and David Cameron set some pulses racing yesterday at PMQs when he told Yvonne Fovargue that 'we will not forget the abolition of the 10p tax rate that clobbered every hard-working person in the country'. But on yesterday's Newsnight Jon Cruddas also dropped a hint that Labour could bring back the rate, and Miliband will shortly confirm this in his speech.

The Tory 2015 message: times are tough, but they’d be worse under Labour

From our UK edition

Today's PMQs was not, as James says, a tricky one for David Cameron. He had some good jokes and embarrassing gossip to poke Ed Miliband with, even though the Labour leader chose to attack on the thorny issue of living standards. The key to the next election will be whether voters feel their lives have improved under the Coalition far more than it is about the latest ONS release on GDP. And the key challenge for the Coalition is to be clear that though things won't be rosy - as Miliband pointed out, the squeeze on living standards will still be taking place when polling day arrives - they would be worse under Labour.

Eastleigh by-election parties fight over policy they both support

From our UK edition

Alarming news reaches this blog from the Eastleigh by-election, where the battle has descended into a catfight about a policy the two main parties support at national level. How unusual for parties to detach themselves from their own policies when a prize seat is in sight: this time round it's the Lib Dems and Tories fighting over a development of new homes in the area on greenfield land. The Lib Dem leaflets promoting Mike Thornton say 'residents are angry with the Conservatives for putting green fields under threat from big builders'. The Tories backing Maria Hutchings point out that Thornton and his Lib Dem colleagues on the council voted in favour of the local plan for Eastleigh, which includes provisions for up to 4,700 new homes on greenfield land.