Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Today’s borrowing figures are bad for the Tories, but they’re not good for Labour either

From our UK edition

Today's borrowing figures are, on the surface, not good for the Tories. The surplus on the public finances in January 2014 was lower than for the same month in 2013, at £4.7 billion compared to last year's £6.0 billion figure (although it's worth pointing out that the difference could get even smaller with subsequent revisions). That disappointing figure means that over the year, Osborne has borrowed just £4 billion than at the same point last year:- These figures give Labour the opportunity to remind voters that George Osborne has failed to meet his own targets.

Food banks: What would Labour do?

From our UK edition

Was the church right to intervene in the debate about food banks and benefit cuts? I argue in my Telegraph column today that it was - but that the way the 27 bishops (more have since spoken out to support the letter to the Mirror - and Justin Welby has agreed with their argument that benefit cuts are pushing up food bank demand) intervened says a number of interesting things about the Church of England today. But there is another interesting question worth asking, which is not what would Jesus do but what would Labour do? As I explained earlier in the week, the party finds these attacks from church leaders very useful at the moment as it feeds into the Opposition narrative about government failure. But how will Labour deal with food banks if it is elected into government in 2015?

He said ‘yes’! Farage agrees to debate Clegg on EU

From our UK edition

He asked… and Nigel said yes. The Ukip leader and his party colleagues had whipped Westminster into a state of great suspense in the 24 hours between Nick Clegg's phone-in on LBC and Nigel Farage's own appearance on the station. And Farage took his time to say 'yes' to the Lib Dem leader's challenge to a live debate on the EU ahead of the European elections. He said: 'I nearly choked on my bacon roll when I heard Nick Clegg say he wanted to have a debate about the big European question because this was the guy three years ago advocating an in/out referendum who now says there shouldn’t be a referendum, but now wants a debate so he’s all over the place.

Europe minister denies UK taking ‘back seat’ in Ukraine talks

From our UK edition

Has the UK been doing enough to respond to the dreadful situation in Ukraine? A peace deal is on the table, but it's clear this morning that nothing has been agreed, with Polish PM Donald Tusk sounding a note of caution that there's an end in sight to this crisis. But there are suggestions this morning that the West has been a bit sluggish and weak in its response. Europe Minister David Lidington answered accusations that the UK was taking a 'back seat' in pushing for a resolution when he appeared on the Today programme: 'I wouldn’t describe it as taking a back seat. I think it would be slightly ridiculous to have 28 foreign ministers all going off in concert. They are acting on behalf of all of us, and we are continuing to be active.

Is Nigel Farage wimping out on scary Nick Clegg’s debate challenge?

From our UK edition

Who knew Nick Clegg was so scary? As James revealed this morning, the Lib Dem leader has challenged Nigel Farage, never knowingly silent, to a televised leaders' debate for the European elections. But the Ukip response isn't quite so enthusiastic. The party's director of communications Patrick O'Flynn has said that ‘it would be ridiculous if Nick Clegg were to refuse to extend his invitation to David Cameron and Ed Miliband too’ and that ‘we also want to know from David Cameron and Ed Miliband that they are not running scared and will be happy to present their case on the EU to the British public as well. We can see no reason why they would not wish to take part’. Farage has his own phone-in on LBC tomorrow morning, where he will respond in full.

David Cameron warns Ukraine’s president: the world is watching

From our UK edition

As violence flared up again in Kiev this afternoon, and EU leaders threatened to impose sanctions on those responsible for the violence in Ukraine, David Cameron issued this statement: 'I am deeply concerned by the scenes we are witnessing in Ukraine. The violence on all sides is completely unacceptable and President Yanukovych has a particular responsibility to pull back government forces and de-escalate the situation. 'Violence is not the way to resolve the political differences across the country. The President needs to engage with the opposition and work with all sides in Ukraine to agree political reforms that reflect the democratic aspirations of the Ukrainian people. There must be a clear commitment to the rule of law, respect for fundamental human rights and civil freedoms.

Why bishops are useful for the Left – for now

From our UK edition

Even though, as I said earlier, it makes sense for David Cameron to come out fighting in favour of his party's welfare reforms after they were slammed by the Archbishop of Westminster, there's a point worth considering about how useful these criticisms from leading lights both in the Catholic Church and Church of England are for the Left. Nichols has since said that the government's cuts and reforms are 'perfectly understandable', but that 'what is beyond my understanding is why a programme of reform needs to result in people who, when they are given some food, burst into tears because they haven't eaten in three days'. This is precisely the stance that the Left has taken on welfare reform.

Want to make welfare a ‘moral mission’? Stop toting it as a weapon.

From our UK edition

Quite naturally, a piece from the Prime Minister claiming that welfare reform is 'at the heart… of our social and moral mission in politics' is provoking hilarity from those who've never backed that moral mission in the first place. David Cameron is writing in the Telegraph as a response to the Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols' comments in the same paper at the weekend that the government's welfare reforms were a 'disgrace'. He argues: 'Of course, we are in the middle of a long and difficult journey turning our country around. That means difficult decisions to get our deficit down, making sure that the debts of this generation are not our children’s to inherit.

The Coalition mating game

From our UK edition

There are ornately-feathered birds in New Guinea that have less bizarre mating rituals than Labour and the Lib Dems. The two parties need to show that it isn't impossible to work with one another in a future coalition while also keeping their own supporters reassured that they're not desperately keen to jump into a bed with another party that activists find themselves embroiled in dirty by-election and local fights with. Hence the weird back-and-forth dances and plenty of displays of aggression that we've seen over the past couple of months. So Ed Balls in January suggested Nick Clegg's head would not be the price of a Coalition after all with the Lib Dems and was immediately slapped down by Clegg.

Cooper’s stop-and search intervention shows danger of giving ground

From our UK edition

David Cameron and his political aides are reportedly stalling over reform of stop-and-search powers because they fear it will dilute the Tories' tough-on-crime message. But this means that Labour, circling like vultures for any waft of political roadkill, have swooped. Yvette Cooper has written to Theresa May offering Labour's support in getting reform of the powers. Cooper says: 'I hope that you will not give in to the Prime Minister’s opposition to change. Everyone agrees that the police need to have powers to stop and search individuals suspected of crime or to prevent a serious threat. Intelligence-led targeting of suspected criminals helps to cut knife crime and youth killings. This is the problem with dithering.

Where would Ed Miliband’s first New Town go?

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband has been singing the praises of New Towns in tonight's Standard, saying a Labour government would use these developments to help solve London's housing crisis. He writes: 'A key plank will be creating new towns in sustainable locations where people want to live, just like earlier generations did in places such as Stevenage and Milton Keynes. Labour will kick-start the next generation of new towns and garden cities around the capital to ease the pressure on London.' Although he doesn't say it, it's a reasonably safe bet that the Labour leader is thinking of Ebbsfleet when he talks about a sustainable location where people want to live. That's where Lord Adonis, who is leading Labour's growth review, has set his sights for a new development.

Tory candidate: Conservative party not doing enough to convince minorities it is not racist

From our UK edition

Is the Conservative party doing enough to attract ethnic minority voters? We've reported previous pushes by Chairman Grant Shapps and Home Secretary Theresa May to appeal to groups who have centre-right values but are turned off the Tories. But the FT today suggests that the top of the party is struggling to show enthusiasm, with one party insider claiming that Lynton Crosby feels it 'muddies the message' to move away from economy, jobs, welfare and immigration. The party's candidate in Dudley North, Afzal Amin, agrees that the Conservatives are failing to communicate properly with ethnic minority voters.

Alex Salmond attacks ‘campaign rhetoric’ with a ‘George Tax’

From our UK edition

After a couple of weeks of something frightening and bad called 'campaign rhetoric' from Westminster politicians, Alex Salmond today tried to reassure Scots that everything would be OK if they did vote for independence. 'The rest of the UK will never be foreign' to an independent Scotland, he insisted, sounding rather in favour of another aspect of the Union (alongside the Queen, the pound and so on). And this 'campaign rhetoric' about the currency union was wrong - and dangerous to the rest of the UK, said Salmond.

Nick Clegg softens his language on Labour

From our UK edition

Nick Clegg's comments on Radio 4 about the possibility of a coalition deal with Labour in 2015 are significant, not because the Deputy Prime Minister is airing the possibility of the Lib Dems striking a deal with the left rather than the right, but because of his shift in rhetoric. Clegg was perfectly clear in his 'No, no, no' speech at the party's 2013 autumn conference in Glasgow that the Lib Dems could do a deal with either party and would tone down the excesses of a Tory or Labour-led government. But his language back then annoyed some people. He said: ‘Labour would wreck the recovery. The Conservatives would give us the wrong kind of recovery.

Jose Manuel Barroso: “Extremely difficult, if not impossible” for a separate Scotland to join the EU

From our UK edition

Jose Manuel Barroso has said before that Scotland would have to apply separately to join the EU if it became independent. But his remarks today on the Andrew Marr Show were far more pessimistic about the prospects of that application being successful. After the three main Westminster parties blew a hole in the reassuring argument that Alex Salmond has been making so far that Scotland could keep the pound, Barroso effectively reminded Scots this morning that a 'Yes' vote won't just mean 'Yes' to independence, it will mean 'Yes' to leaving the EU too. He said: 'First of all, I don’t want now to go into hypothetical questions.

Tory Wythenshawe response suggests inertia over blue collar vote

From our UK edition

The Conservatives were never going to win the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election. But the way the party has spun its third place is slightly depressing. The Times today quotes a party source saying: 'This is a safe Labour seat with the largest council estate in Europe. It's not on our marginal list.' Now, this is an understandably pragmatic way of viewing a by-election. It wasn't expected, as it was prompted by the tragic and untimely death of a respected Labour MP, Paul Goggins. So the Conservatives were not embedded in the constituency in the way that they were in Eastleigh, for instance. Labour moved the writ for a short by-election campaign, which also meant that Ukip didn't have as much time to make its case, particularly to postal voters, as it would have liked.

MP tries to remove the poison from the food debate

From our UK edition

One of the more unpalatable news stories of the week was the survey by West Yorkshire councils that seemingly innocuous food was made up of all sorts of things that either weren't what they claimed to be, or weren't very much like food at all. It's another sign of the food problems that this country faces, on top of food banks and poor diet. Recently, though, the food debate has become as poisoned as vodka made from antifreeze, with politicians using food banks in particular as a political football to prove their own points, rather than bothering to examine the complex problems behind them. But one of the MPs who has spent some time thinking about food in 21st century Britain is now trying to encourage independent study of how to improve the food system in this country.

Boris and ballots: what might happen to the Tory party in 2015

From our UK edition

What are Boris Johnson's real chances of becoming Tory leader? I examine the Mayor of London's standing with Conservative MPs in my Telegraph column today - and it is fascinating how polarised opinion is about the Mayor in the Tory party. His supporters insist he is the only hope for the Conservative party, while those who don't want him to lead really, really don't want him to lead and display a fair bit of personal hatred when talking about the Mayor. But the problem that those in the anti-Boris camp have is that they can't see who else from the current group of well-known leadership hopefuls would enjoy the same sort of cut-through. As for when he might come in, my sources among those who are actively promoting Boris in the Commons are adamant that this is about 'post-Dave'.

Ukip beats Tories in Wythenshawe as Labour hold seat

From our UK edition

So Ukip did come second in the Wythenshawe by-election (and Labour won, of course). David Cameron says the 4,301 votes (17.95% of the vote and a 14.5% swing) that John Bickley won wasn't 'the sort of break through that people were talking about'. The Prime Minister, who saw his own party pushed into third place with 14.5% (3,479 votes), did also say that 'obviously messages are sent, and signals are sent and protests are made and governments should always listen to those things and I always do'. Now, the usual caveat that you can't extrapolate very much from a by-election in one constituency applies. But Ukip can reasonably claim that it is becoming the official opposition in the north when it comes to by-elections at least.

Theresa May turns to deaths in custody after stop-and-search row

From our UK edition

One of the risks for Theresa May in her battle with Number 10 over reform of stop-and-search powers is that the Home Secretary loses some of the capital she has built up with BME voters over the plans. Last summer, black newspaper The Voice ran an edition suggesting that Labour could be losing the black vote and specifically pinpointed May's work on stop-and-search as a sign that the Tories were starting to appeal to groups they'd previously alienated. But this week May is back in The Voice with an op-ed on deaths in custody. You can click on the image to view the article in full. It is significant, though, that the Home Secretary is unable to mention her work on stop-and-search reforms.