Newspapers

Even by the debased standards of the tabloid press this Guardian account of how the News of the World intercepted and deleted messages left on Milly Dowler's mobile phone days after the 13 year-old's disappearance in 2002 must represent a new low. That's assuming the Guardian story is accurate, of course, but there seems little reason, at present, to doubt it. It may be one thing to spy on movie stars and pop sensations; quite another, most people will think, to use the same "techniques" in the matter of a missing - and subsequently murdered - teenage girl. As Nick Davies and Amelia Hill report: [W]ith the help of its own full-time private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, the News of the World started illegally intercepting mobile phone messages.

It's New Jersey so nothing should surprise anyone. Still, it turns out that the problem is that the cocaine has been cut with levamisole, a drug traditionally used to deworm livestock. So caveat coker if you're in America this summer. Also, of course, one of the problems with illegal but popular markets is that the people who run them are so often so dashed unscrupulous...

Sure, the Scottish edition of the Sun splashes with Play It Again Salm as it endorses the SNP but its Irish sibling has a much better story:   River Beast's Rampage and Farmer Attacked by Furbag are just extra, glorious, titillating teasers. But this is what happens when you forsake the Horse Outside for a van...

Hugh Grant's account of a (secretly-taped!) conversation he had with a former News of the World hack-turned-whistleblower is most entertaining. Credit to our friends at the New Statesman for commissioning* it. There's plenty to enjoy, including this fine exposition of the mentality of our upstanding truth-seekers in the popular prints: Me Well, I suppose the fact that they're dragging their feet while investigating a mass of phone-hacking - which is a crime - some people would think is a bit depressing about the police. Him But then - should it be a crime? I mean, scanning never used to be a crime. Why should it be? You're transmitting your thoughts and your voice over the airwaves. How can you not expect someone to just stick up an aerial and listen in?

Brother Korski is right to draw attention to Rachel Sylvester's interview (£) with Unite's Len McCluskey and right too to note that his defence of Castro's island gulag* is indefensible. But there's more that's wrong with it than that and not all of that is McCluskey's fault. Consider these lines: He would choose tea and scones at Fortnum and Mason over beer and sandwiches in a smoke-filled room. He is a fan of the romantic poets — “I love Byron, Keats and Shelley, I’m a romantic at heart” — and takes a feminist interpretation of Christina Rossetti.

Note, please, the wisdom of the man from the San Francisco Examiner who says "We aren't going to make much [money] from this*." *So, yeah, subscribe to the Spectator. Please. It's good for you and, quite importantly, good for us too.

MPs are pretty out of touch, of course, clueless about the way "ordinary people" live. That's what we're supposed to think of course. We're not supposed to remember that MPs probably regularly encounter a much broader range of public opinion and circumstance than highly paid columnists and political editors. Here, for instance, is Ben Brogan committing the sin of assuming (I presume) that everyone is just like the people he meets: If the higher rate threshold stays the same, and yet more thousands of the ’squeezed middle’ are brought into higher rate tax, at what point do we review terms, and rename the 20p rate the lower rate, the 40p rate the basic rate, and the 50p rate the higher rate?

Ben Goldacre deplores the reluctance of newspapers to link to original sources and then demonstrates why they don't: Professor Anna Ahn published a paper recently, showing that people with shorter heels have larger calves. For the Telegraph this became “Why stilletos are the secret to shapely legs”, for the Mail “Stilletos give women shapelier legs than flats”, for the Express “Stilletos tone up your legs”. But anybody who read even the press release, which is a readable piece of popular science itself, would immediately see that this study had nothing whatsoever to do with shoes. It didn’t look at shoe heel height, it looked at anatomical heel length, the distance from the back of your ankle joint to the insertion of the Achilles tendon.