Dominic cummings

Monday

Isabel Hardman

Michael Gove is being helped by Labour’s poor discipline and weak attacks

It doesn't really matter whether Dominic Cummings' Times interview was unhelpful to Michael Gove. Labour has just been about as helpful to the Education Secretary as it possibly could be without announcing that it supports everything he does, right down to the detail of the history curriculum. Education questions this afternoon was the perfect opportunity to exploit the gift of an interview in which Gove's trusted former adviser attacked David Cameron and the Number 10 operation. But the attack never really came. Kevin Brennan asked about Cummings' line that he signed into government departments and Number 10 as 'Osama bin Laden'. Gove's reply was, as predicted, ornate and beautifully defensive.

Isabel Hardman

How will Gove deal with Dominic Cummings’ attack on Number 10?

One of these days, former Gove adviser Dominic Cummings is going to tell us what he really thinks. He's followed up his interview with the Times (£) in which he describes David Cameron as 'bumbling' and attacks the team around the Prime Minister with a blog examining the gap between politicians and the electorate and the failure of successive governments to learn from mistakes. The main problem for Number 10 in Cummings' analysis of the way it works is that he's not the only one who holds that opinion. He argues that Number 10, like MPs, has 'no real knowledge of how to function other than via gimmick and briefings' and that it avoids 'solving very hard problems'.

Alex Massie

David Cameron is a Tory, not a radical. Which is both a strength and a problem.

There is much to enjoy in Dominic Cummings' glorious attack on the ghastliness of Britain's political system. It is a cri-de-coeur from a man who, whatever else may be said of him (and his enemies have plenty to say), has given the matter some thought. Westminster will swoon at the criticisms of Cameron ('a sphinx without a riddle'), Ed Llewellyn ('a classic third-rate suck-up-kick-down sycophant presiding over a shambolic court') and Craig Oliver ('just clueless')  but that's just the gags, really. The substance is elsewhere. As in: “MPs have no real knowledge of how to function other than via gimmick and briefings. That’s also how No 10 works. It’s how all of them are incentivised to operate.

Thursday

James Forsyth

Nick Clegg’s loopy strategy

I am beginning to think that Dominic Cummings has driven Nick Clegg round the bend. The Lib Dem leader should want this row over universal free school meals to go away; it is a massive distraction with elections only six days away. But he can't help himself from keeping it going. So, today we have a joint Gove Laws op-ed in The Times declaring that they are not at loggerheads over the policy. This is accompanied by a news story which reveals that Clegg demanded that Gove write the piece. The piece also reveals, rather unhelpfully, that some schools are not on track to deliver the policy in time for September. Not content with this, Clegg has been busy stoking the row in his morning interviews. He doesn't seem to realise that he has a lot to lose while Cummings has nothing to lose.

Sebastian Payne

Podcast: Race, genes and history, Nick Clegg’s war and the curious case of Mo Ansar

Is there a link between race, genes and history? On this week’s View from 22 podcast, author Nicholas Wade discusses his Spectator cover feature on what the last 11 years of human genome decoding tells us about human evolution. Is it racist to combine the politics of race and genes? Is there a link between historical events, such as the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and genetics? And does Nicholas expect to be ostracised for writing on this controversial topic? Douglas Murray and Haras Rafiq also discuss who exactly is Mo Ansar. How did a former bank employee become the preeminent voice of British Islam? Why did this ‘Twitter personality’ become such a fixture on our TV screens? Does Mo operate 'sock puppet' Twitter accounts to reinforce his opinions?

James Forsyth

Nick Clegg’s weird war with a former Gove adviser

[audioplayer src="http://traffic.libsyn.com/spectator/TheViewFrom22_15_May_2014_v4.mp3" title="James Forsyth and Miranda Green discuss Nick Clegg's war with Dominic Cummings" startat=590] Listen [/audioplayer]We’ve come to expect strange things from coalition government, but the events of the last few days have been particularly odd. On Saturday, several newspapers contacted the Department of Education about a story claiming that its budget was in chaos. Officials set about drafting a clear rebuttal. But this was vetoed by David Laws, the Liberal Democrat schools minister, preventing his department from denying a damaging story. This act of self-harm was just the latest twist in the spat between the Liberal Democrats and Michael Gove’s former adviser, Dominic Cummings.

Tuesday

Fraser Nelson

Revealed: how Nick Clegg cooked up his ‘free school meals’ pledge

For those who missed Dominic Cummings, recently departed Michael Gove adviser, on BBC Radio 4's World At One, here's the extraordinary transcript which confirms what Coffee Housers will have feared. He didn't give an interview, but responded to the BBC's questions (below) about Nick Clegg's plan to give free school meals to all school pupils - even the offspring of millionaires. And to me, this sums up why coalitions are a bad idea. The junior partner gets desperate for a jazzy-sounding idea to call their own, so ambush their senior partner. An announcement is made, for reasons of spin and nothing else. No policy work is done. The expectations of millions of parents are raised, schools without kitchens are plunged into chaos, and unaffordable promises made.

Wednesday

Ed West

Intelligence is just another privilege you inherited from mummy and daddy

I’m starting to get the impression that the Guardian isn't very keen on Michael Gove, and may not give him the benefit of the doubt in their reporting. The latest offering was this, ‘Genetics outweighs teaching, Gove adviser tells his boss’, which was presumably designed to infuriate teachers, about an essay written by Dominic Cummings. This was followed up by a Polly Toynbee piece denying the role of hereditary factors in intelligence and claiming that it was all part of some government plan to keep the poor in their place. Others have waded in, raising the spectre of eugenics, and I imagine someone is right now composing a comment piece about Dr Mengele’s legacy with the headline MICHAEL GOVE’s ‘FINAL SOLUTION’ FOR POOR CHILDREN.