Amy Coney Barrett v. Ketanji Brown Jackson
This is not personal; this is what intellectual combat looks like
This is not personal; this is what intellectual combat looks like
The power of federal judges to constrain the executive branch has been curbed
In Murthy v. Missouri , the justices were afraid of issuing a ruling unpopular with the regime and its media
Democrats call it a ‘court in crisis’ after bogus attacks
The longer the spasm of investigative reporting goes on, the more desperate it sounds
Ruthkanda for-never
Men and women of the working class, Catholic or not, are arraigned by progressive yappers for being socially retrograde
Whiners of the literary world, unite!
The significance of Amy Coney Barrett ’ s confirmation
How can I extol the virtues of anti-racism while birthing another white person?
Its latest term saw it embrace self-government
Their rhetoric on abortion has become downright dystopian
The divisiveness of politics in the last decade masks a bipartisan accord on elite credentials
Fulton v. Philadelphia is a crucial case for religious liberty in America
‘Living where I live, I’ve learned to keep my views to myself and focus on my kids’
The greatest surprise from this week’s hearing: Judge Barrett is normal
Is the term ‘sexual preference’ offensive? It depends who’s saying it…
Gone is any focus on Barrett’s personal life. Discussion of her fervent religious beliefs are verboten
Three Supreme Court justices for one Trump term is a good trade
Democratic leaders are being drawn into battle on ground less favorable than that which they already occupy