2012 election

The mental health election spiral

My first semester of college coincided with the 2012 presidential contest between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. I was a conservative from a small rural town at an elite liberal university, and this was not great for my social life. My freshman floormates at Georgetown defaced my political signs, made nasty comments to me in the hallways and on election night my RA dropped by my room to rub it in my face when the race was called for Obama. The following morning, we all went back to class and started preparing for midterms. Four years later, universities across the country all but shut down when Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Suddenly the mental health of the losers was priority number one. Classes were canceled to allow students space to grieve.

mental

Bill’s shattered Kristol ball

Bill Kristol suggested that to get rid of Trump Republicans, it might be necessary for anti-Trumpers to be “with the Democrats for a while.” In a chat with Politico this weekend, the Weekly Standard founder proposed a Gretchen Whitmer-Abigail Spanberger ticket, in what would be a perfect combination of TikTok mom-schmaltz and Beltway hackery. Luckily, though, Kristol’s prediction record is — to put it nicely — lacking. Let’s start in 2008. Kristol was a huge proponent of then-Alaska governor Sarah Palin for John McCain’s vice presidential pick, saying, “Go for the gold here with Sarah Palin.” McCain and Palin lost by 10 million votes and received only 173 electoral votes to Obama and Biden’s 365. It’s not like Kristol was just a decade too early, either.

bill kristol the weekly standard

President Trump should bend — but not break — Big Tech

Americans’ increasing focus on this fall’s elections has awakened in me a tinge of nostalgia for the good old days of campaigning — before the internet changed everything. As a conservative running for the US Senate in 1994, I remember being able to connect with thousands of voters to respond to my opponents’ dishonest attacks, the press’s deceitful characterizations of my positions, local television refusing to cover my campaign events, and the character assassinations by the newspaper editorial boards. Actually, I don’t remember that, because I had no way to reach thousands of voters except by paying those same media outlets millions of dollars to buy ads.

trump

Barack Obama’s foreign policy boast unravels after election

From our UK edition

What a lot of things President Obama seems to have been holding back until after his re-election. Each day brings something new. There has been the news of an attack by Iran on a US drone in the Persian Gulf. Then there is the Petraeus affair – known about for months, but only leading to the CIA chief's resignation immediately after Obama's re-election. The Benghazi hearings are yet to come. And now another surprise. It transpires that the Iraqi government, a body which is only in power because of the sacrifice of thousands of American, British and other allied troops, is releasing from custody a senior Hezbollah terrorist who was in detention for killing American troops.

The Romney campaign meets electoral reality

From our UK edition

When I worked in Washington, I was shown round the White House by a junior Bush administration staffer. As our group made it round the building we passed various photos of George W. Bush signing bits of legislation into law, at nearly everyone our guide would stop and tell us how many voters in various key states would benefit from it. When there was a picture of Bush with a governor, we’d be regaled with both sets of approval ratings. It was clear that whatever the administration’s flaws - and there were many - it had an acute understanding of the importance of data and the changing nature of the American electorate. One would have thought that the campaign of Mitt Romney, a hugely successful businessman, would also have understood the importance of clean, reliable data.

The Democrats won more than just the Presidency on Tuesday night

From our UK edition

The focus, of course, is on President Barack Obama's resounding re-election — but there are plenty of other reasons why Democrats are celebrating Tuesday night's results. In the summer, it looked like Obama's party would struggle to maintain their Senate majority. Instead, they have extended it. Embattled incumbents held on in tight races in Missouri, Montana and Ohio. The Democrats also retained vulnerable seats in New Mexico, North Dakota, Virginia and Wisconsin despite the incumbents having retired. And they took seats off the Republicans in Indiana and Massachusetts, to take their total up to 54 Senators — and it could rise to 55 if newly-elected independent Angus King decides to caucus with them. The Democrats also beat expectations in House elections.

Immigration is only part of the problem Republicans have with hispanic voters – Spectator Blogs

From our UK edition

Lord knows there are plenty of people to blame for Mitt Romney's defeat. One chap has not been mentioned often enough, however. Step forward and take your medicine Rick Perry! The Governor of Texas, who once persuaded otherwise sensible folk (and me) he was a more than plausible contender for the GOP nomination, played an important part in securing Barack Obama's re-election. Perhaps the President should send him a set of Presidential-seal embossed cowboy boots. There are bound to be some left from the Dubya days. It was Perry who insisted that, if you had a heart, you should support Texas's policy of not preventing the children of illegal immigrants from getting a college education. These kids, in Texas at least, are treated like any other kids in the Lone Star State.

Oh say can you see, MPs on a jolly

From our UK edition

Team Cameron, as my colleague James Forysth points out, are rather pleased with Obama’s victory. Downing Street’s finest have been pushing the idea that Barack Obama’s victory speech echoed, word for word, Cameron’s constant refrain that ‘we are all in this together’ and that the 'inherited economic mess' is slowly being overcome. Dave the Statesman, don’t you know? Obama has his admirers on the Opposition benches, as we know. The Labour Party was out in force at the two biggest victory bashes in central London last night: CNN’s opulent shindig at One Mayfair and the tackier affair at the US Embassy.

US election 2012: do Conservative values no longer matter on the American right?

From our UK edition

What's happened to America's social conservatives? Eight years ago, traditional 'values voters' were said to have been key to Bush's victory. Karl Rove was credited with a strategic master stroke — by persuading the President to talk about 'life', not 'abortion', he was said to have motivated the conservative base while reaching across the centre to sympathetic undecideds. But now, Karl Rove is a GOP monkey on Fox News, and the electoral landscape looks very different. Indeed, Obama might have just played the 2004 Republican trick in reverse — by targeting the Republican weakness among women in swing states, he mobilised the left and appealed to moderate American ladies disturbed by Republicans making bizarre comments about rape.

US election 2012: Obama’s victory is a relief for David Cameron

From our UK edition

David Cameron welcomed Barack Obama's re-election in the early hours of this morning, tweeting: 'Warm congratulations to my friend @BarackObama. Look forward to continuing to work together.' He later released this statement: 'I would like to congratulate Barack Obama on his re-election. I have really enjoyed working with him over the last few years and I look forward to working with him again over the next four years. There are so many things that we need to do: we need to kick start the world economy and I want to see an EU-US trade deal. Right here in Jordan I am hearing appalling stories about what has happened inside Syria so one of the first things I want to talk to Barack about is how we must do more to try and solve this crisis. Above all, congratulations to Barack.

Obama keeps that hopey-changey thing going in victory speech

From our UK edition

Even though Obama's victory speech in Chicago was far less hopey-changey than his rockstar delivery four years ago, the re-elected president did still manage to sound a little as though he was delivering an address at a wedding, smoothing over the ugly bits and telling America that 'the best is yet to come'. Both he and Mitt Romney made calls for co-operation between Republicans and Democrats, with Obama saying: 'Tonight, you voted for action, not politics as usual. You elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours, and in the coming weeks and months I am looking forward to reaching out and working with leaders of both parties to solve problems we can only solve together.' He said he wanted to speak to Romney about where the Republican candidate might be able to work with him.

US election 2012: the broadcast election

From our UK edition

One product of the modern communications age is that we can all follow what US outlets and Twitter are saying while watching the BBC coverage’s of the US elections. This creates a whole host of challenges for the Beeb. Back in the day, few would have noticed that there was a gap between the US networks calling the key state of Ohio for Obama and the BBC catching up. But this time, it stuck out like a poor thumb. The other great challenge for any international broadcaster is the sheer quality of the coverage on US television. One can chuckle at NBC and their political editor having a ‘Command Centre’. But their understanding of the key swing counties in each state is unrivalled.

US election 2012: Obama’s re-election

From our UK edition

In the end, Barack Obama won re-election comfortably. The Obama political team again demonstrated its ability to get the vote out where it needed it. The margin might have been narrower than in 2004. But it was, in purely operational terms, a more impressive victory; triumphing against the backdrop of a still stuttering economy. For the Republicans, there’s much to reflect on. The party’s demographic problems are now too serious to ignore. In 2004, Bush won 41% or 44% of the Hispanic vote—depending on which pollster you want to use. But this time, Obama won 72% of Hispanics.

US elections 2012: God Bless Negativity

From our UK edition

Today, says American political journalist Michael Brendan Dougherty, '120 million Americans will choose who they don't want to be president.' Exactly — for all Mitt Romney and Barack Obama's upbeat noise over the last few days, the 2012 US presidential elections have been motivated, entirely, by fear and loathing. The key questions: Are you so fed up with Barack Obama that you can bring yourself to vote for Romney? Or do you hate the Republicans enough to vote for Obama? With all its attack ads and its mudslinging, this election has been negative populism from the start. It's not liberalism vs conservatism; it's anti-liberalism vs anti-conservatism. Let's not be pious, though. Passion and 'values' are hugely overrated virtues.