Randi Weingarten is using mafia tactics to bully Target into denouncing immigration enforcement by ICE. As president of the American Federation of Teachers – which holds at least 7 percent of Target stock through teacher pension funds – Weingarten sent a letter to Target’s CEO explicitly threatening the company’s relationship with her union’s massive pension holdings unless it publicly opposes ICE operations in Minnesota.
This move was not subtle. Weingarten made clear that the AFT viewed the retailer’s refusal to denounce federal law enforcement as a threat to “shareholder value.” She followed up with additional pressure, leading her union to pass a resolution directing its 1.8 million members to boycott Target for back-to-school shopping. Teachers were told to take their school supply dollars elsewhere if Target remained insufficiently anti-ICE.
This kind of bullying sure smells like a possible breach of fiduciary duty. Pension-fund fiduciaries are legally required to manage investments solely for the financial benefit of participants, not to advance unrelated political causes. Weingarten is using her union’s pension funds to threaten a company over a political disagreement that has nothing to do with education or shareholder value. Such behavior could be illegal under both fiduciary standards governing public pensions and, in the case of the coordinated boycott, potential antitrust rules against secondary boycotts aimed at coercing political action.
Weingarten’s campaign against Target began earlier this year after ICE increased enforcement operations in Minneapolis, Target’s hometown. Weingarten demanded that the company publicly call for ICE to leave Minnesota.
Weingarten makes more than $500,000 a year to push politics rather than do anything to increase student achievement. This partisan tilt is unmistakable. In the last election cycle, 99.89 percent of the political contributions from Randi Weingarten’s union went to Democrats.
The AFT is not a neutral professional organization working on behalf of teachers and students. It operates as a powerful arm of the Democratic Party machine, channeling member dues into one-sided political warfare. While American students continue to fall behind in reading and math, the AFT leader focuses her energy on culture-war crusades and corporate pressure campaigns.
Her latest stunt fits a clear pattern. Weingarten announced a partnership with the World Economic Forum to create a curriculum for kids in the United States. She also held children’s education hostage during Covid by lobbying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to keep schools closed as long as possible.
The union’s political games extend well beyond retail boycotts. Randi Weingarten’s union was behind the “No Kings” protests. Teachers unions were the driving force behind the May Day protests that used children as political pawns alongside the Communist party. And at their annual convention last year, Weingarten’s union passed a resolution to teach “about the insidious nature of white supremacy.”
These ideological crusades and pressure campaigns reveal the union’s core priorities. While American students continue to suffer from stagnant test scores and learning loss, the AFT leadership devotes its resources and influence to partisan activism and corporate intimidation. Teachers’ dues and pension assets have become tools for enforcing political conformity rather than improving classrooms or securing retirement benefits.
Teachers who are fed up with Randi Weingarten using their union dues and pension funds for these political games should opt out. They can join the Teacher Freedom Alliance for free instead. The Teacher Freedom Alliance exists to give educators a real voice without forcing them to subsidize partisan activism that has nothing to do with their classrooms or their retirement security.
The Target episode reveals how teachers unions operate. They do not exist to improve education. They function as powerful political machines that extract compulsory dues and control enormous pools of pension capital. They then deploy both to advance an agenda that frequently harms the very students and families they claim to serve.
School choice offers the best counter to this monopoly power. When parents can choose where their children learn, unions lose their captive customers and must compete on results instead of political muscle. Until then, Weingarten will continue treating corporate America like a protection racket, demanding ideological conformity in exchange for access to teachers’ retirement savings and consumer spending.
Parents and taxpayers have every reason to be outraged by this pattern of abuse. Teachers unions like the AFT have long enjoyed monopoly power in public education, shielded from competition and accountability. This power allows leaders like Weingarten to treat pension funds and member dues as personal war chests for political battles that have zero connection to reading, writing, or arithmetic.
The result is a system where corporate America faces economic blackmail for refusing to toe the progressive line on issues like immigration, while the real victims are the students trapped in failing schools and the teachers whose retirement security is gambled on ideological whims. School choice empowers families to escape this racket, forcing unions to focus on actual education instead of playing politics with other people’s money.
The American Federation of Teachers wants to dictate corporate policy on immigration while its own members’ students struggle with basic skills. That mismatch should alarm every taxpayer and parent. Public school monopolies and their union leaders have grown too comfortable wielding economic threats to achieve political ends. The rest of us should stop subsidizing the racket.
Comments