Tim Shipman

Tim Shipman

Tim Shipman is political editor of The Spectator.

Twelve things we learned this week

When I started out in Westminster in 2001, the parliamentary lobby was a very hierarchical place and the press gallery still had a dining room. We young pups would gather several times a week on the lobby table and listen attentively to the war stories of lobby legends like Phil Webster, Trevor Kavanagh, Michael White, Andy Grice and David Hughes, then the political editors of the Times, Sun, Guardian, Independent and Mail. Some fondly recalled being told off by Margaret Thatcher or watching Labour’s battles with Militant in the early Eighties. The consensus view, however, was that the peak time for political chaos (and by extension political journalism) was the period of John Major’s premiership after Black Wednesday, an era of plotting, infighting, power struggles and chaos.

Can Starmer escape his problems in Munich?

Can Starmer escape his problems in Munich?

11 min listen

Keir Starmer has headed to Germany for the Munich Security Conference to meet allies and discuss defence, NATO and the war in Ukraine. He is expected to meet Chancellor Merz and President Macron later, before delivering a speech in the morning. But – after his worst week as Prime Minister – can Starmer use this moment to reset his image as one of a statesman on the world stage, or could his problems follow him to Munich? Lisa Haseldine is attending the conference and joins Tim Shipman and James Heale to discuss. Produced by Patrick Gibbons.

Starmer's downfall TBC

Labour turns on Starmer – inside the collapse, with Guto Harri, Tim Shipman & Toby Young

45 min listen

‘Authority is like virginity. Once it’s gone, it’s gone’ – that's just one of the damning quotes about Keir Starmer that Tim Shipman has extracted from sources inside the Labour government. Much of Starmer's bad luck this week is arguably of his own making, so why is he seemingly so bad at being the Prime Minister? For this week's Edition, host Lara Prendergast is joined by political editor Tim Shipman, associate editor – and Conservative peer – Toby Young, and the broadcaster Guto Harri, who – as a former director of communications at Number Ten himself – knows a thing or two about the brutal reality of being at the heart of government.

Is Antonia Romeo what the civil service needs?

13 min listen

When a PM is in crisis, what do they do? Sack the head of the civil service. Having lost both his Chief of Staff and Director of Communications at the beginning of the week, Keir Starmer resolved to make it a hat-trick by dispensing with the services of his short-serving Cabinet Secretary. The favourite to replace him is Antonia Romeo – currently doing great work at the Home Office, but comes with a series of ‘caveats’ concerning historic allegations of bullying and irregularities over expenses when she was in New York. She has been cleared of these and passed the civil service vetting process (with caveats) – although Simon McDonald, the former Permanent Secretary at the Foreign Office, has popped up in the news to warn No.

Is Antonia Romeo what the civil service needs?

The case for Antonia Romeo

A few thoughts about the Antonia Romeo furore. This will doubtless not help her at all but Starmer would be nuts to cave in on appointing her as the first female cabinet secretary. 1) Yes, she is ballsy and brassy (in a very posh way), likes a party and mixes with all sorts of interesting folk. She’s flirty and fun and scary in equal measure but these outgoing people skills mean she brings people with her. Is she better with men than women? Possibly. She’s ambitious! And admits it! Good grief. A woman with ambition. Whatever next? Starmer would be nuts to cave in on appointing her as the first female cabinet secretary 2) Bluntly, she's also an arse-kicker, a doer, someone who partnered with Shabana Mahmood, forming the best minister-mandarin double act in Whitehall.

Keir Starmer gets angry

15 min listen

PMQs today and – as predicted – Keir Starmer came out worst in a pretty unpleasant session. Kemi Badenoch pinned the Prime Minister on the continued Mandelson fallout and now the scandal over Matthew Doyle, the former No. 10 comms chief who – just four weeks after his ennoblement – Labour have already been forced to kick out of their party in the House of Lords, after it emerged he had campaigned for a friend charged with possessing indecent images of children. Once again, one of those mysterious appointments for which the Prime Minister is never responsible came back to haunt him in public – sound familiar?

Keir Starmer gets angry

‘Authority is like virginity. Once it’s gone, it’s gone’: Inside Keir Starmer’s downfall

Years ago, Peter Mandelson shared a key lesson with his protégé Morgan McSweeney. Reminiscing about his involvement in Labour’s 1987 general election campaign, he called it the ‘spray-paint election’. The manifesto was a ‘beautiful technicolour’ document but the tax-and-spend shibboleths of Old Labour remained, along with the policy of unilateral nuclear disarmament. ‘I spray-painted the old Ford Cortina,’ Mandelson told McSweeney, ‘but it was still a Cortina. Policy is at the heart of political communication.’ Only after the election – a second three-figure landslide defeat – did Labour launch a policy review, out of which New Labour emerged. Even then it took another decade to win power.

McSweeney resigns – is Starmer next?

25 min listen

Morgan McSweeney resigned yesterday as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff and – while it was not a surprise, given his role in appointing Peter Mandelson – the news that the Prime Minister has now lost his closest aide and political fire blanket is a huge shock. The repercussions are numerous: Starmer loses the man widely regarded to have won him his large majority and someone who was popular in No. 10; he has recruited two new deputies to fulfil a role considered insurmountable for one person; and it sets a precedent that anyone who allowed Mandelson to become US ambassador is liable for the chop. For a Prime Minister without a political philosophy, McSweeney was the man with the plan – where does Labour go from here? Is this the end for Starmer – and who might replace him?

McSweeney resigns – is Starmer next?

Jonathan Hinder: ‘I don’t know if Starmer should fight the next election’

On this special edition of Coffee House Shots, Tim Shipman is joined by Jonathan Hinder – a rising star of the back benches and a blue Labour acolyte – for a candid discussion about the state of the Labour party and the security of its leader. They discuss the Peter Mandelson scandal and the impact it has had on backbench support for the Prime Minister, as well as the implications it may have regarding decision-making at the top of government. Are Labour MPs considering moving against Keir Starmer? Should he fight the next election? This is set within the context of local elections, which Jonathan forecasts will be ‘bad’ for the Labour party – ‘it’s not a great time to be a Labour MP’, he says. Is there a route back for the Labour party?

Jonathan Hinder: ‘I don’t know if Starmer should fight the next election’

Morgan McSweeney’s resignation won’t save Starmer 

Morgan McSweeney has resigned, which felt inevitable but is still a shock to the government and to SW1 in general. His closeness to Peter Mandelson and his role in promoting him for the ambassadorship in Washington has been exposed as a grave error – though not, I think, one which was as predictable as everyone now claims. In his dignified resignation statement, McSweeney writes: ‘When asked, I advised the Prime Minister to make that appointment and I take full responsibility for that advice. In public life responsibility must be owned when it matters most, not just when it is most convenient. In the circumstances, the only honourable course is to step aside.’ The problem is that McSweeney was not the only one advising on Mandelson.

Labour has bottled it – what happens next?

Where are we then, after the most consequential week in British politics since the last one? Keir Starmer no longer commands a majority in the House of Commons on key issues he cares about, the basic requirement which gives prime ministers their constitutional legitimacy. That much became clear on Thursday when Angela Rayner and other Labour MPs sided with the Tories to insist that the Intelligence and Security Committee should decide – not the cabinet secretary – which documents on the decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States should be released. So Labour has a working majority of 156 but Starmer no longer commands it. He is functionally finished as prime minister.

AI will bring down Keir Starmer – if Peter Mandelson doesn’t first

AI will bring down Keir Starmer – if Peter Mandelson doesn’t first

43 min listen

Is Britain ready for Artificial Intelligence? Well, bluntly, 'no'; that's the verdict if you read several pieces in this week's Spectator – from Tim Shipman, Ross Clark and Palantir UK boss Louis Mosley – focused on how Britain is uniquely ill-placed to take advantage of the next industrial revolution. Tim Shipman's cover piece focuses on how the Labour government is approaching AI – there are some positives but, overall, Britain's creaky bureaucracy is blocking progress. To discuss this week's Edition, features editor William Moore is joined by political editor Tim Shipman, commissioning editor Lara Brown and the Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine. Are you a tech-optimist or part of the 'analogue resistance' that Sarah professes to head?

Could the herd move on Starmer?

11 min listen

James Heale, Tim Shipman and Oscar Edmondson discuss the continuing fallout over the Mandelson scandal. The mood amongst Labour MPs is pretty dire – following a bruising PMQs and a government climbdown over the release of Mandelson's vetting files – but is it bad enough for Labour MPs to challenge Starmer? And could his chief of staff – and close Mandelson ally – Morgan McSweeney be in the firing line? How long ago the decision to block Andy Burnham seems now...

Could the herd move on Starmer?

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

15 min listen

Another impressive PMQs from Kemi Badenoch – but she had plenty of ammunition to deploy after the Peter Mandelson scandal took a bleaker turn this week. The Prime Minister clearly wanted to make a strong statement in his first answer to Kemi Badenoch, saying that ‘Mandelson betrayed our country, our parliament and my party’. He added: ‘He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador. I regret appointing him.’ He then listed the actions he had taken to strip Mandelson of his title, remove him from the Privy Council, and refer material to the Metropolitan Police. The whole thing exposed Starmer’s biggest weaknesses: his over-reliance on process and his inability to consider how the public see him.

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

Is Keir Starmer prepared for the AI-pocalypse?

Is there any area of public policy which Keir Starmer’s government has got right? ‘Where very little is working, AI is a bright spot,’ says a former adviser. ‘They’ve started well but they are now in danger of blowing it.’ When Labour came to power they consigned much of the past 14 years of Tory rule to the dustbin. But Starmer poured resources into Rishi Sunak’s AI Security Institute and published an AI Opportunities action plan in January last year, declaring (very un-Starmerishly) that he wanted to ‘mainline AI into the veins’ of the economy. Last week an audit found that 75 per cent of the proposals had already been delivered – a level of success rare in Whitehall.

What next for Peter Mandelson?

12 min listen

It is one of the staple headlines of British politics: Peter Mandelson has resigned. The so-called Prince of Darkness was sacked as US ambassador last September, yet that has done little to stem the flow of stories about the alleged nature of his relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. This weekend saw the publication of a further three million emails, triggering another avalanche of claims about Peter Mandelson’s links to the dead sex offender. So what next for Mandelson? And which former political grandees have successfully managed the transition out of the Commons? Should he be taking notes from George Osborne? James Heale and Tim Shipman discuss. Produced by Megan McElroy and Oscar Edmondson.

What next for Peter Mandelson?

Starmer’s Chinese trip changes nothing

I just had lunch with several European ambassadors and they asked me whether Keir Starmer’s trip to China was important or significant. My answer was that it was important but not significant. Starmer has been given a respectable degree of pomp, will be able to point to multiple billions in Chinese investment in British firms and has today secured the lifting of Chinese state sanctions against British parliamentarians. Iain Duncan Smith, Tom Tugendhat and others will now be able to travel to China should they wish.

Rayner vs Streeting – and what is 'active government'?

Rayner vs Streeting – and what is ‘active government’?

18 min listen

In his column this week, Tim Shipman has finally hit upon an answer to the age-old question: what is Starmerism? After a concerted effort from his team to tie the Prime Minister down to a definitive ‘-ism’, he has delivered a threefold structure: firstly, the contestable claim that Labour has achieved macroeconomic stability by clinging grimly to the Chancellor’s fiscal rules, which will mean interest rates and inflation fall; secondly, Starmer will say Britain needs an ‘active government’ to intervene directly in retail offers; and finally, the PM will seek to tie together domestic and international policy by arguing that Britain needs ‘an active and engaged government abroad’ if it is to control the cost of living at home.

Is centrism dead? | with David Gauke, vice-chair of Prosper UK

22 min listen

Is centrism back? This week a group of former Tory heavyweights – including Ruth Davidson, Andy Street, Amber Rudd and David Gauke – have launched a new group aimed at reclaiming the centre ground and dispelling the myth that politics in 2026 is a straight shooting match between increasingly diffuse left/right poles. They say that there are seven million voters in the centre who feel ‘politically homeless’ and are looking for serious people to have serious conversations, rather than rabble-rousers with strong rhetoric. Are they totally misunderstanding the direction of modern politics? And should they all just join the Lib Dems? Tim Shipman speaks to David Gauke, former justice secretary and vice-chair of Prosper UK. Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Oscar Edmondson.

Is centrism dead? | with David Gauke, vice-chair of Prosper UK

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs

10 min listen

It is our solemn duty to inform listeners that David Lammy won deputy PMQs at a canter today. To be frank, it was a low-rent affair. Andrew Griffith was the Tory sent out to question David Lammy while Keir Starmer is in China, and the shadow business secretary didn’t do a particularly good job. Perhaps he had assumed that Lammy would have another disastrous session, like he did when a prisoner was accidentally released last autumn. There were a few decent jokes in there – mainly about football – but the overwhelming winners were Kemi and Keir, who by comparison look like Gladstone and Disraeli. James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs